win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: second dimension vs. gravity shift  (Read 1239 times)

bowler851

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
second dimension vs. gravity shift
« on: January 19, 2009, 11:25:56 PM »
I currently own a gravity shift and throw it most of the time and was looking to get another pearl and was looking at this one.
Logged

 

Z Jellsey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 358
Re: second dimension vs. gravity shift
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2009, 08:32:23 AM »
Very similar reactions for me. I think the 2nd dimension is more angular in the back part of the lane.
Logged

thatg00se

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: second dimension vs. gravity shift
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2009, 07:36:03 AM »
The 2D, IMO, will have a stonger midlane read than the GS where I feel the GS can provide a quicker response off the spot( more angular). That's not to say the 2D doesn't face up, because it does that extremely well and the continuation through the deck is outstanding. Also, the 2D has a better look when carry down is a factor. I have both and the layouts for them are miles apart, they both serve different purposes. Can't go wrong with either piece.
--------------------
SkillZ pay BillZ
Logged

tfav44

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: second dimension vs. gravity shift
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2009, 10:02:51 AM »
how about the t road pearl or the hyroad?
--------------------
tfav44
twisted fury
eraser boost
ebonite bash.
a bad night of bowling is better than a good night at work.
every frame is a opportunity to succeed!
www.virginiabeachtraveltips.com
Logged

tburky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
Re: second dimension vs. gravity shift
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2009, 03:27:47 PM »
My 2nd hooks more down lane than the gravity shift.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »