BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: azus on November 23, 2006, 05:57:13 AM

Title: Spit Fire or Fired Up
Post by: azus on November 23, 2006, 05:57:13 AM
Whats the difference between the fired up and the spit fire?
--------------------
I like my coffee black, just like my metal.
What would Chuck Norris do?
(\ /)
( . .)
c(')(')
Cute Bunny! copy bunny into sig to help him achieve world domination
Title: Re: Spit Fire or Fired Up
Post by: Lillen on November 23, 2006, 02:17:23 PM
Quote from an earlier review:

The Spitfire is a great compliment to the popular Fired-Up. The Spitfire features an inverted Twin-V core, with the puck on the bottom instead of the top. With the Fired-Up, you were drilling into the cap and changing the core shape ( adding differential ). With the cap on the bottom, you are keeping the core integrity intact and allowing the ball to keep a "rollier" motion. The change of direction downlane is much smoother with the Spitfire, and the direction change comes 4'-5' sooner than the Fired-Up. To me the Spitfire is perfect for fresher conditions where the backends are just too extreme for the Fired-Up. I can see the Spitfire being used for 3-5 games, and then letting the Fired-Up take over for the finish.
--------------------
Bowl up a Storm,
Jeff Carter
www.stormbowling.com
www.jeffcarterbowling.com
Title: Re: Spit Fire or Fired Up
Post by: azus on November 23, 2006, 02:35:56 PM
Ok, then im gonna get a Fired Up, because i need something with more kick.
--------------------
I like my coffee black, just like my metal.
What would Chuck Norris do?
(\ /)
( . .)
c(')(')
Cute Bunny! copy bunny into sig to help him achieve world domination