BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: spartanplayaAA on November 30, 2006, 06:57:14 AM

Title: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
Post by: spartanplayaAA on November 30, 2006, 06:57:14 AM

how do these two compare, thinking of getting both of them along with a fired up to complete the lower end of my arsenal. if i were to get these three, my arsenal would look as follows:

fired up
spitfire
thunderstruck solid
vapor zone
scorchin inferno

i know the fired up will tend to go longer and flip harder than the spitfire, but how about the spitfire compared to the t-struck solid. thanks

dave

Title: Re: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
Post by: bowlingmaniac017 on November 30, 2006, 03:03:41 PM

From what I have seen and thrown... The Spit Fire is very rolly and the Thunderstruck Solid is extremely smooth in the midlanes with a controlled backend.

I think it was Jeff Carter that said this:

"Thunderstruck Solid rolls thru the midlane like a solid but has the backend of a pearl"
--------------------
Mike

Title: Re: spitfire vs. thunderstuck solid
Post by: Fluff E Bunnie on December 01, 2006, 06:45:49 AM

I'll agree with that.  The T-Struck is very smooth rolling but it has a big continuous backend.  I find it to be quite the perfect all-around ball.

The Spit Fire I haven't used though...  I know Storm has a video of it on their site.

--------------------
My Bowling Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8Tm5tQltTQ&NR