BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: UNObowler01 on December 04, 2008, 03:20:11 AM

Title: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 04, 2008, 03:20:11 AM
Well, we are five tournaments deep in our first season on Storm contract, and I thought I would post my thoughts on what we've drilled so far.  Since I drill all the team's equipment, I have a bit different opinion on some of them than my players do, so bear with me.  All the guys will be posting their own reviews of this stuff in the coming weeks, so you can read their thoughts as well.  These are just my thoughts as an overseer.

We have drilled at least one of nearly every ball in the lineup at this point (and some that aren't), so I will list them in order of our receipt of the products.  We've had more time with some of them than others, and I've seen them on all sorts of different surfaces and patterns.  Here goes.

Dimension - this is as good a heavy-rolling solid sanded reactive ball as I've seen in a while.  It reminds me alot of an Ultimate Inferno, a ball that I was in love with when I bowled in college.  I find it to be versatile as well, I've seen the guys use it from all sorts of angles and it has plenty of power at the pins, especially for a sanded ball.  We haven't experimented with polishing them yet, but we may do that now that the Virutals have started showing up.  

Gravity Shift - A favorite among the guys that are a bit softer with their ballspeed.  It reads in the midlane very well and recovers from almost anywhere.  We had (and continue to have) great success with these at a hand-applied 2000 grit surface when the lane opens up.

T-Road Solid - One of the most versatile balls in the lineup.  This core controls the midlane better than any other, and surface tweaks make it such that you can make the ball your most aggressive or make it almost skid-flip.  In the box finish it is an excellent heavy roll that makes a strong enough move on the backend to keep pins flying.  Its a great benchmark ball.

T-Road Pearl - I think we will drill more of these before the year is over, because you get all the midlane control of the solid with easy length and tons of recovery downlane.  If it weren't for the Gravity Shift, everyone would have one of these, but I feel they overlap a bit.  For the price though, hard to ignore this kind of performance.

Rapid Fire - The most under-rated ball in the line.  I don't feel the Rapid gets enough credit, and I was so impressed by this one that I personally drilled two of them.  Easily tunable cover and a smooth overall reaction.  It is a great alternative for a T-Road solid for guys with less ballspeed.  Very easy through the fronts and a smooth read downlane.  

Rapid Fire Pearl - I almost feel this ball is more aggressive than the solid version.  It reads the midlane very strong for a pearl and just keeps coming on the backend, and does it all without even touching the lane in the heads.  Great from inside angles due to the recovery and ease through the fronts.

Street Rod - Another underrated ball.  The Reactor cover is still great.  Wrapped around a simple lightbulb you wouldn't expect a whole lot, but this thing is really a sleeper.  Really smooth off the spot and controls the midlane very well for a medium/lower flare ball.  Guys with hand love it, and it gets through the pins very well.  

Street Rod Pearl - Keep it shined and it will get you to the pocket on even the toastiest of lane conditions.  Not as flippy as alot of pearls, due to the lightbulb core.  The guys with hand love it, just like the solid.  They make an excellent 1-2 combo that alot of people would overlook.  

Spit Fire - This is a ball we would have missed out on but I managed to snatch up a few here and there.  It doesn't get much better than this ball when the track opens up.  It doesn't jump off the dry and is a great choice in anyone's hand when the lanes get dry.  If you need a bit more pop than a pearl street rod, this is the way to go.  I had to grab a few to keep around, because these are the real deal.

Hy-Road - The response to this ball has been huge.  Drilled one up, and instantly everyone wanted one.  It has the nice heavy roll of the solid T-Road with the ease through the fronts of the pearl.  This will be in everyone's bag before long.  I can see it getting alot of playing time in the middle of blocks, it responds to friction the way you like to see it.  Strong, but not flippy.  The guys create a lot of room with it.

Virtual Gravity - This ball is unreal.  With all the midlane roll you get you don't expect backend reaction like this, but its there.  The guys that don't have as much hand are loving it because it opens up the hook spot on the fresh.  I was using pin-up layous on theirs, and it comes off the spot very strong and carry is phenominal.  I am interested to see what it would do with some shine.  When we drill them for the guys with more hand, I'll try some pin-down layouts to smooth it out some.  The Dimension is great, but this ball is a whole new animal.

Top to bottom, the line is very versatile and I feel we can cover most anything.  I've had very few problems matching my players with good core/cover combos, and the performance we get out of everything is very good.  I couldn't be happier with it so far.

Thanks to Kevin Ellis at Storm, and his buddy Roger Noodhoek at RotoGrip.  Kevin has shown great support for our team, as has Roger for our ladies team.  It has been a great season so far, and we hope to build on the success we've had to this point, with the help of our friends at Storm!

--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: MC on December 04, 2008, 11:24:40 AM
Thanks for the summary. Good luck the rest of the season.
--------------------
"Don't Give Up...  Don't Ever Give Up."       -Jim Valvano

"Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."         -Vince Lombardi

VISIONARY TEST STAFF 07/08

Tag Team Coaching success story

             www.visionarybowling.com

Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: gtkpr31 on December 04, 2008, 11:41:54 AM
Great post, J.J.  Really gives those who aren't as familiar with the Storm line a great grasp of what they can expect with the balls.  I've thrown almost all of these myself and agree with you on most of your reviews.

I find the Rapid fire pearl to be almost too strong on most lane conditions.  It breaks loose when it hits the dry.  Amazing ball to open up the lane with.

The T-Roads and Hy-road, IMO are the greatest 1-2 (and now 1-2-3) punch in recent memory, or ever.  I just can't say enough about them, and the price is great as well.  If you wanted to, you could probably tackle most lane conditions with just these 3 balls.  The solid is my go to ball when the lanes get tight.

I would suggest trying some attitude shifts if you can get them.  I drilled up a few for myself and a bunch for customers of mine.  With the exception of the new beasts (Dimension and Virtual) it's one of the heaviest rolling balls i've had in a long time.  But the thing is, even though it rolls that heavy, the backend is amazing.  My track is pretty low and rev rate is high(PAP is 3 1/2 -- rev rate 425) so everything backends pretty decently for me but I was amazed at how well this responds in the back part of the lane with the roll it generates.

Great post, and good luck the rest of the season!
--------------------
This is life.
This is struggle.
This is love.
This is war.
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: WSUstroker on December 04, 2008, 11:48:48 AM
That's a nice write-up there JJ.  Lots of good stuff in the Storm catalog to choose from.  I see UNO is still making their yearly trip to Oshkosh to win the Titan Invite, congrats on that victory again this year and good luck the rest of the way.
--------------------
Dan Chambers
www.absolutebowling.com
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: riggs on December 04, 2008, 01:09:17 PM
Very well described JJ.
Curious if you've run into certain core/cover/drilling/whatever combos that have NOT worked well for certain styles.  Sometimes that helps people avoid costly mistakes in trying a certain ball and drilling.
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Monster Pike on December 04, 2008, 02:07:05 PM
Ditto what everyone has said so far!!  Nice to see someone take the time to do this.  Thanks!!
--------------------
"The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it." Rodney Dangerfield

Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: thirtyclean on December 04, 2008, 02:26:07 PM
Have you thrown the Sure Fire yet, and our thoughts ?
--------------------
Thirtyclean (Well maybe 29, or 28, most of
the times !)
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 04, 2008, 03:41:28 PM
Dan-thanks for the congrats.  5th time in 6 trips we've won it.  The ladies even came along this year, and had a rediculously good tournament.  I think Mankato is hosting a tournament next semester, you should come out and say whats up!  

riggs-I did have a Gravity Shift I drilled that rolls, well, we'll say not as good as the rest of the stuff.  Higher track player, 17-18mph, medium revs (325-350).  I did a 4 x 4 (pin & mb), which is supposed to really bring it on the backend, but it really didn't fit the bill for him.  Its great for going straighter on some friction, but doesn't boomerang on the backend like we'd hoped it would.  Hard to say avoid this drilling, because typically 4 x 4 is pretty universal.  More than likely just a case of a ball just not matching up.

Thirtyclean-We did drill a couple Sure-Fires, and they are not a bad ball either.  In the box finish (duller) they are a great benchmark, good midlane read and smooth backend.  Overall, they are a bit less aggressive than the current line stuff. Best results would be for someone who is a bit softer with the speed.  I drilled one for a high rev guy and one for a speed dominant player.  The high-rev guy's rolls sweet, he doesn't like it as much (that is where the differing views come in).  I love the look he gets, he doesn't. The speed dominant guy doesn't throw his much, but on fresh stuff with backends, it rolls great.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: dougb on December 04, 2008, 06:47:21 PM
As a Storm fan, let me say thanks for the post.  Wish I had one of every ball in the line-up!

Doug
--------------------
Complete ball arsenal:
Storm Gravity Shift
Storm T-Road Pearl
Lane #1 Bullet
Hammer Cherry Vibe
Brunswick BVP Wizard
Columbia 300 White Dot - Blue Pearl
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Mr Straight Ball on December 05, 2008, 09:26:50 AM
J.J. as a high RPM guy, I'll interject why your high octane guys don't care for the Sure Fire. I have owned a Pyro, Spit Fire & 3 Fired Ups so you know I have great appreciation for the Fire Line. By the way, you were nailing the other balls reactions. You should look at the Shift for the guys too Storm makes one heck of a pearl particle.

With the Sure Fire, my take on it was that as a Fire Line ball – it just did not measure up! Fire Line balls are “ignorant” by nature, they glide down the lane and bust loose. The Sure Fire just rolled and never made that trademark disrespectful move a Fire Line nugget is suppose to make. My Sure Fire saw two layouts and numerous cover adjustments and what I found is that when the shot was funky it shined but in my book it was too conditional to take a spot in the bag as I decided what to take to a tournament. My friend who gets plenty on it had the same opinion about his Sure Fire. He described what he saw reaction wise and I laughed because it was what I described.

I am a big supporter of the hybrid cover stock and this one just let me down. Now the Hy-Road (cannot wait to get another) and Hot Rod Hybrid (had 2) they hit the mixture just right! Both balls handled the front part of the lane with ease and read the midlane, making it a lot easier to line-up and adjust as the game rolls on.

Storm made one "iffy" ball in some time, oh well. They have been on point with the other releases!
--------------------
Baker...Why doesn't my ball hk?
40 Boards & A Ball Tournament Director
www.40boards.com
40 Boards is proudly supported by Storm Products & Glen Burnie Pro Shop
"The left sucks & the right is wide open!" R.I.P. Brizmo 6/15/08

Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Kingdom on December 05, 2008, 09:50:55 AM
J.J
I am wondering what equipment has matched up for your bowler that you mentioned higher track 17-18 mph 300-350 rpm? I fall into this category, am using a Gravity Shift as my benchmark ball & am having some issues with reactions. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

--------------------
Jim K

"50 isn't old it is a lifestyle change"
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Monster Pike on December 05, 2008, 10:31:37 AM
quote:
You should look at the Shift for the guys too Storm makes one heck of a pearl particle.

40 Boards is proudly supported by Storm Products & Glen Burnie Pro Shop
"The left sucks & the right is wide open!" R.I.P. Brizmo 6/15/08



+1.  Was just gonna mention the Shift, until I read your post.  What a great ball.  Once the cover is broken in, at least for me, this ball is money.
--------------------
"The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it." Rodney Dangerfield

Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 05, 2008, 02:41:56 PM
Kingdom-His Virtual (with a bit different layout) is actually very good.  Out of the box, his Gravity was just a boomerang off the dry but wouldn't touch the lane on oil.  We have it at 2000 abralon right now and, like you would think, it doesn't respond to friction like he'd like it to.  Overall it was too over/under for him and we can't seem to find a happy medium.  If I had to do it different, I'd do it pin under with a big hole in the thumb positive quadrant, but live & learn.  He's going to punch a HyRoad and maybe another ball yet, so we'll see how that goes.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Kingdom on December 05, 2008, 03:06:51 PM
quote:
Kingdom-His Virtual (with a bit different layout) is actually very good.  Out of the box, his Gravity was just a boomerang off the dry but wouldn't touch the lane on oil.  We have it at 2000 abralon right now and, like you would think, it doesn't respond to friction like he'd like it to.  Overall it was too over/under for him and we can't seem to find a happy medium.  If I had to do it different, I'd do it pin under with a big hole in the thumb positive quadrant, but live & learn.  He's going to punch a HyRoad and maybe another ball yet, so we'll see how that goes.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009



Thank you for the information. Can you let me know the layout on the Virtual?
The best look I got with my Graviy has been 800 sand with clean & sheen compound finish. It helped tame the over-under on the fresh...still a little sensitive to cary down.

--------------------
Jim K

"50 isn't old it is a lifestyle change"
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: armswing on December 06, 2008, 03:27:03 PM
super review super review thx a bunch.
--------------------
ARMSWING
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: BOWLGNUT on December 06, 2008, 03:44:04 PM
That is one of the best reviews of bowling balls that I read in awhile even when it comes from a coach of one of the best bowling teams.
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 06, 2008, 04:02:07 PM
Kingdom-The Virtual is a 5" pin 3" MB to pap, no hole.  Pin is over bridge.  Cover was left OOB.  It really rolls good.

Bowlingnut-Thanks for the kind words!
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 08, 2008, 01:06:17 AM
This makes Storm's line up a bit easier for me to understand in terms of what each ball is capable of.  When I get the chance, I will probably be throwing all Storm stuff and this layout of most of the balls helps me out.  When I decide to stop throwing my current equipment they will be replaced with Storm equipment that works on the same conditions(thinking Hy-Road for Rival, Gravity Shift for Counter Strike, and Street Rod Pearl for Avalanche Solid).  All I need right now is a heavy oil ball and I plan to get a Virtual Gravity to fit that bill soon.  There's a big chance I'll be throwing my current stuff for quite some time so I might just get the balls to replace them when I am able to and store them until needed.  That way if they get discontinued I will have them already.
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 08, 2008, 09:03:12 AM
That is the thing I have been most impressed with, is the fact that their line covers so many conditions.  Storm has a bunch of very versatile, affordable symetric balls that can be tuned to fit your needs (whatever they may be), and you get tons of performance out of the high end stuff.  You really can't go wrong.


--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 08, 2008, 07:21:10 PM
One thing I've kinda been stuck on though is what the Gravity Shift works well on.  Personally, I would intend to use it on med-light fresh conditions or conditions where it's getting difficult to get through the heads and/or there's some bump area to swing to.  I'm not sure but I would almost want the Rapid Fire Pearl instead, but I like that the Gravity is more rolly.  I'm slightly rev dominant but pearls, especially when polished don't work too well for me on medium or heavier conditions, Solids are always safer for me there.

Edited on 12/8/2008 8:22 PM
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: raiderh20boy on December 08, 2008, 07:54:43 PM
Great post on THE BEST equipment out there! One question not related to Storm
Was Bill Straub the coach there a while back??
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Monster Pike on December 08, 2008, 07:58:49 PM
quote:
One thing I've kinda been stuck on though is what the Gravity Shift works well on.  Personally, I would intend to use it on med-light fresh conditions or conditions where it's getting difficult to get through the heads and/or there's some bump area to swing to.  I'm not sure but I would almost want the Rapid Fire Pearl instead, but I like that the Gravity is more rolly.  I'm slightly rev dominant but pearls, especially when polished don't work too well for me on medium or heavier conditions, Solids are always safer for me there.


I agree, especially w/the bolded stuff.  I am a touch speed dominant, but have been working on that, & I find the Gravity also more arcy reaction than angular.  I like my solids, Attitude Shift & now Virtual, on the fresh or when there is mucho carry down.
--------------------
"The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it." Rodney Dangerfield

Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 08, 2008, 09:29:16 PM
Glad you agree .  That info is just based on my observations, and considering I've seen less than 5 of these in action I think that's pretty good.  On fresh conditions, I'd even use a Rapid Fire or Hy-Road(probably without polish on either, though) unless there's more than medium/heavy volume, then I'd find myself switching to the Gravity Shift then Street Rod Pearl(if necessary) as the lanes transition.

The only thing I question in my mind is can the SRP handle real dry(hard to find head oil, dry mids and backends)?

Regardles, I can't deny that Storm has definitely done a good job this year coming up with these balls, since they do in fact cover a wide variety of conditions.
--------------------
The Arsenal:

Rival
Counter Strike
Avalanche Solid
Maxim
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 09, 2008, 09:56:51 AM
We've had more success with the Gravity with guys with slower speed.  The higher speed guys its a much smoother read, and needs friction to react as advertised.  

Raider-Bill coaches, and always has coached at the University of Nebraska Lincoln.  I actually went to his camp several times as a junior bowler and his methods are a strong basis for how I learned the game, and how I teach my players.  I bowled here at UNO and have been helping to build our program since my days as a player.

If Bill is anything, he's a master of the fundamentals and swing mechanics.  His players are (typically) the most funamentally sound players out there.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 12, 2008, 06:34:25 PM
Given my specs(in profile), would I be able to drill a Gravity Shift to use on med-light conditions, above a Street Rod Pearl and below a Hy-Road?  That's where I'd like it to go personally, and I was thinking of putting a 50 x 4.75" x 65 dual angle on it when/if I got one.
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Rival on December 12, 2008, 06:47:19 PM
Technically I guess you could squeeze the Virtual under the Hi-Road, but it would be kinda pointless.  I don't see the point in going and getting a complete oiler only to drill it weak and hell and have it not do what it was advertised to do.  I think the T-Road Pearl would be between the Hyroad and the Street Rod... but I'm no professional here.
--------------------
"So there I was... BALLS DEEP!!!"

My Arsenal:

Storm Ace
Roto-Grip RSX
Ricochet Revenge
Total NV
Rival
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 12, 2008, 08:19:38 PM
I didn't say anything about the Virtual.  I said Gravity Shift.  You know, the pearl version?
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Rival on December 12, 2008, 08:40:53 PM
My mistake... apparently I'm seeing stuff tonight...
--------------------
"So there I was... BALLS DEEP!!!"

My Arsenal:

Storm Ace
Roto-Grip RSX
Ricochet Revenge
Total NV
Rival
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Wingzero on December 12, 2008, 10:43:51 PM
I love this review of the latest Storm equipment. Pretty much spot on and informative. Thanks for this post.
--------------------
Just your typical non-descript bowler living life in Vegas(Sin City...hmmm...guess that's why my mind & balls are in the gutter).
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 14, 2008, 08:28:52 AM
quote:
Given my specs(in profile), would I be able to drill a Gravity Shift to use on med-light conditions, above a Street Rod Pearl and below a Hy-Road?  That's where I'd like it to go personally, and I was thinking of putting a 50 x 4.75" x 65 dual angle on it when/if I got one.


If you have Hy-Road as your most aggressive ball right now, the Gravity isn't a TERRIBLE idea to fit below it, but it will be a lot more aggressive downlane.  I have to agree with Stupid Seven Pin on this one, the T-Road pearl is a more natual jump from there.  

It really depends on what you're looking for.  If you want to stay with the smoother shape like the HyRoad, I see three options in the Storm line:  1) A T-road pearl with a length drilling (5" pin over), 2) A Rapid Fire pearl with a similar layout (5" pin over), which will give you more action downlane than the T-Road but similar amount of hook, or 3) A Street Rod Solid with about a 4 x 4 and shine.  

IMO, the Rapid Fire pearl would give you a bit different shape with the added length over a Hy-Road that you're looking for.  Gravity is a great piece, but I think it may be primarily too strong for what you're looking for.  Your choice though, and happy hunting!
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 14, 2008, 06:04:36 PM
I do not have a Hy-Road, but I am brainstorming a Storm arsenal(pardon the pun).  Pearls, especially polished, have always seemed to be a little lengthy for me.  I'm a tad rev dominant which is why it's sort of strange that I have problems with pearls.  I used to have an Angular One drilled around 4.5" pin up and polished that ball skated a lot(possibly too oily though).  I was actually thinking of going with the Rapid Fire Pearl anyways, because of it's skid/snap nature.  While I'm not very thrilled about that motion, I'm sure it's weaker than the Gravity and will fit the intended condition better.  I don't think it would hurt to drill it pin down though, 4.75" pin, as length is a given with that ball and considering my past experience.

I know the Gravity is only a pearlized Virtual which is very strong, but still a pearl and I can't help but think that for me it wouldn't handle more than medium oil.  I was thinking this ball in the first place because I would want a different core than the Hy-Road so I was trying to avoid the T-Road Pearl, but the RFP works too.

Edited on 12/15/2008 0:49 AM
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Brodieman on December 14, 2008, 10:58:07 PM
quote:
I do not have a Hy-Road, but I am brainstorming a Storm arsenal(pardon the pun).  Pearls, especially polished, have always seemed to be a little lengthy for me.  I'm a tad rev dominant which is why it's sort of strange that I have problems with pearls.  I used to have an Angular One drilled around 4.5" pin up and polished that ball skated a lot(possibly too oily though).  I was actually thinking of going with the Rapid Fire Pearl anyways, because of it's skid/snap nature.  While I'm not very thrilled about that motion, I'm sure it's weaker than the Gravity and will fit the intended condition better.  I don't think it would hurt to drill it pin down though, 4.75" pin, as length is a given with that ball and considering my past experience.

I know the Gravity is only a pearlized Virtual which is very strong, but still a pearl and I can't help but think that for me it would handle more than medium oil.  I was thinking this ball in the first place because I would want a different core than the Hy-Road so I was trying to avoid the T-Road Pearl, but the RFP works too.


The only thing I can compare it to would be the Fired UP.  If its anything like it, though it was skid snap by nature it did read the lane very well.
--------------------
Frodo Baggins has failed...George Bush has the ring...
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 16, 2008, 11:19:07 AM
quote:
I do not have a Hy-Road, but I am brainstorming a Storm arsenal(pardon the pun).  Pearls, especially polished, have always seemed to be a little lengthy for me.  I'm a tad rev dominant which is why it's sort of strange that I have problems with pearls.  I used to have an Angular One drilled around 4.5" pin up and polished that ball skated a lot(possibly too oily though).  I was actually thinking of going with the Rapid Fire Pearl anyways, because of it's skid/snap nature.  While I'm not very thrilled about that motion, I'm sure it's weaker than the Gravity and will fit the intended condition better.  I don't think it would hurt to drill it pin down though, 4.75" pin, as length is a given with that ball and considering my past experience.

I know the Gravity is only a pearlized Virtual which is very strong, but still a pearl and I can't help but think that for me it wouldn't handle more than medium oil.  I was thinking this ball in the first place because I would want a different core than the Hy-Road so I was trying to avoid the T-Road Pearl, but the RFP works too.

Edited on 12/15/2008 0:49 AM


Strike, I wouldn't say the Rapid Fire Pearl isn't as skid-flippy as you might think.  That ball reads the midlane and recovers alot with the R2S pearl cover.  It is longer than a T-Road pearl though for sure.  

A pin-down layout will smooth the backend and take away from the "flippy" that you might tend to get with a pearl.  Its all a question of whether you want:

A)To get a slightly different reaction characteristic by changing core/cover combo and using a familiar layout
B) Obtain a slightly different reaction by using a similar core & different cover with a different layout, or
C) To obtain a completely different motion by using a new core/cover combo combined with a different layout.

Its the beauty of ball dynamics baby!  The possibilities are endless...thats what makes it fun!

Brodie-

I haven't found anything in the current line so far that is comparable to the Fired Up.  It is way more skid-snappy than the the new stuff, which is completely a testament to the Reactor cover around a Twin-V core.  It really sails through the fronts, and brings the heat off the dry.  I am more a fan of the Spit Fire, its a bit smoother down lane.  The newer Twin-V offerings (Rapid Fires) are alot more aggressive.

Not really sure if that was in context or not, but wanted to give my opinion of the Fired Up since it was mentioned.  AWESOME ball for playing extreme inside angles, another reason why alot of the Storm staffers still use them (Jeff Carter, Norm Duke).
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: Jay on December 17, 2008, 12:42:39 AM
Ah, okay.  Well, I would want a different motion than the smooth roll of the Hy-Road while handling the next volume in oil down.  So I'd definitely opt for the Rapid Fire Pearl.  I'm guessing the Gravity is just too strong due to its R2X base cover, being asymmetric, and it's quite midlaney.  It'd be more of an alternative reaction to the Hy-Road than a step down, is that right?

Anyways, I'm always thinking about layouts.  I was wondering why you say 5".  Pin up that would be right above my middle finger, maybe just a hair right, but that probably doesn't mean too much.  Being polished and pearl I actually see myself putting only 4 1/2" pin to pap on that, thinking something like 60 x 50 dual angle.  My Counter Strike isn't polished but it's drilled 60 x 4 1/2" x 35(pin 1" above and just left of my ring finger) and it's too responsive to dry for my taste when the heads start going.  Maybe I can polish it to make that better but I think the VAL angle is too little.  I figure 5" pin to pap would have made he ball less useful on the conditions it currently works on.  Thoughts?

By the way, I really appreciate your help with all this.  I just like Storm a lot even though I've never thrown a ball by them(if that makes any sense) and I'm determined to throw their stuff over other companies.  With smart layout choices I believe I can achieve the reactions I want on the intended lane conditions.

Edited on 12/17/2008 1:55 AM
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on December 17, 2008, 11:44:44 AM
You're absolutely right to think that with smart layout choices you can cover what you need.

The Gravity does roll in the midlane quite a bit for a pearl, but with the box finish still goes straight left at the end of the pattern.  The key with that ball is to use longer pin-buffer to smooth it out, thats when it is great.

You can do a couple things to avoid the over-under you have experienced with pearls.  You can use a bunch of CG swing and put a good size hole on your axis, that smooths it out alot.  Or, you can use no hole and use like 4000 or 2000 abralon on it.  You still retain the ease through the fronts with the finer finish, but it reads the end of the pattern smoother.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009
Title: Re: Storm overview (IMO)
Post by: UNObowler01 on January 15, 2009, 01:28:26 PM
Bump this back to the front for anyone who may not have seen it.
--------------------
J. J. Mastny
Mens Head Coach
University of Nebraska Omaha Bowling
STORM/ROTOGRIP COLLEGIATE PROGRAM 2008-2009