Post by: PikevilleBwl on December 10, 2003, 11:50:15 PM
Post by: LuckyLefty on December 12, 2003, 03:03:52 AM
Boy the cores sure look the same but there is a difference in asymmetry for super charge and a .50 versus .40 differential.
I've always found a difference in that much differential.
REgards,
Luckylefty
Post by: T-GOD on December 12, 2003, 10:56:06 AM
The Power Charge has a ball in the center of it. The Super has 2 sideways pucks in the center. Yeah, they both have a flip block on the bottom, but that's as close as they come to each other.
There is no way the 2 balls will roll the same, even if the RG and Diff. #'s are the same, or close. That's why the numbers don't mean much. It's all about the core shape..!! =:^D
Post by: BadShot on December 14, 2003, 07:23:47 PM
--------------------
That which does not kill me makes me stronger . . .
Post by: T-GOD on December 14, 2003, 08:08:04 PM
Post by: Next Level PS on December 14, 2003, 09:31:22 PM
--------------------
www.bowlritelanes.com
www.nextlevelproshop.com
also know as VortexII
Post by: T-GOD on December 14, 2003, 09:50:13 PM
All I did was point out that the Super Charge core and the Power Charge were very different. Why are they NOT that much different..? Take away the puck on the bottom, and what do you see as being the same..?
Yeah, they're both round balls with a compound core, but does't the shape, size and density of the weight block mean anything..? =:^D
Post by: Jeffrevs on December 15, 2003, 06:43:19 AM
I pretty much gaurantee that Storm will NOT do a pearl version of the Super Charge,...that IS the Power Charge Pearl.
Are they the same ???? No, ....But I wouldn't say they're THAT much different but they're certainly different enough! So I'll go in between Jabroni and T-GOD on this one....and oh, by the way,.....get a room guys!
--------------------
JEFF
Post by: kendog on December 15, 2003, 07:51:51 AM
--------------------
kendog avoids spare shooting at all costs
'speshly 10 pins
Post by: Jeffrevs on December 15, 2003, 07:54:30 AM
quote:
Jabroni, sounds like Jeff's been reading Dr Phil's new book.
--------------------
avoids spare shooting at all costs
'speshly 10 pins
not my style Ken
--------------------
JEFF
Post by: jensm on December 15, 2003, 08:10:09 AM
--------------------
Regards,
jensm
Edited on 12/15/2003 9:15 AM
Post by: brimar on December 15, 2003, 08:38:30 AM
quote:
I saw Finnish amateur international Lasse Lintila throw what I think was the Super Charge in the Super Series tournament in Kungsbacka, Sweden, last weekend. It seemed to overreact in the backend so he put it away after a few frames and pulled out an Eraser Boost instead. He seemed to have better control with this one. The pattern was an asymmetric 40 feet christmas tree similar to the one they used in 2001 (http://66.70.217.221/tournaments/2001/international/Super6Kungsbacka2000-2001/tournament.htm) This time they had put out a bit more oil to keep the lanes from opening up too much.
--------------------
Regards,
jensm
Edited on 12/15/2003 9:15 AM
Anyway i have to agree with jeff, they balls are very similar in design but the SC is gonna roll way sooner and come in harder due to:
A. matt finish
B. bigger differential
I have the power charge and it goes extremely long. it clears the heads with ease but it makes a strong recovery. Carry down kills it. I can see the super charge taking over when theres carrydown.
--------------------
Thanks for reading my post.
Post by: BadShot on December 15, 2003, 10:35:37 AM
the rg and differential are different on the super charge and the power charge pearl. the flare potential is different. the coverstocks are not even the same (you can have a pearlized variant of a non-pearlized cover, can't you?). you say the numbers are "close" . . . they don't give stats to the nearest 1/1000th for no reason.
the cores are completely different- not remotely the same. the storm drilling instructions say the super charge has a mass bias that is marked. anybody can see by looking at the core that it's asymmetrical (the correct spelling, by the way), even if the mass bias is not marked.
nothing you say can change that.
you're not working in a pro shop, actually recommending equipment to customers and (heaven forbid) drilling bowling balls, are you?!?!?
you're complaining that you're being taken out of context, and being ripped apart . . . i haven't read anything you've posted that has been correct.
and just one last indication of your blatant stupidity . . . in your last post here you say, "I said nothing that was viscious in my post to anyone." (it's spelled vicious, by the way). then you go on to rip people as being lane #1 groupies and a pack of trolls. even your signature is offensive.
just admit you've been wrong, and you'll try to do better in the future. admitting that you have a problem is the first step toward recovery.
--------------------
That which does not kill me makes me stronger . . .
Post by: Jeffrevs on December 15, 2003, 01:12:41 PM
quote:
I think I have proven my point well here...the balls are ALL symmetrical, and "NOTHING YOU CAN SAY WILL CHANGE THAT"....
The Super Charge is asymmetrical
--------------------
JEFF
Edited on 12/15/2003 2:11 PM
Post by: BadShot on December 15, 2003, 01:23:32 PM
--------------------
That which does not kill me makes me stronger . . .