I almost wish you hadn't asked this question. I just drilled up both, with the Blue/Black Polar Ice intended as a spare ball and the SN (75x 4.75 x45) intended as a dry lanes strike ball.
(Keep in mind that I am just returning to bowling after a 3 month "injured reserve" for a sprained slide ankle; so my ball speed and rev rate aren't up to normal yet.)
I've used the SN twice in practice session and its reaction so far is almost hyper sensitive to any carrydown or spottiness. If it sniffs oil in the breakpoint area, it doesn't seem to make the turn. So much so that the Polar Ice seems more consistent in the small hook I like for most spares. Since I throw it all over the lane, to make spares: 2/4/5, 4 pins, 10 pins, 3/6/10s and so on, it hits almost every board in the house at one time or another. So it's bound to hit oily spots here and there. (Remember that the SN and the Polar Ice use 2 different urethane formulations!)
This is only an initial report and it could be the summer oil or carrydown from open bowling AND I'm just not up to par yet. But I don't like the SN's reaction so far. I just joined a summer league to bowl on regular oil; they oil just before league starts. There was plenty of oil, too much for a urethane for my current release. I used a 4000 grit Shout and intend to bring a 4000 grit Karma solid and an IQ Tour Pearl next week to this league.
With your rev rate, the SN should be a much more appropriate ball. My normal rate is in the 300 - 350 range; my current rate is probably 250 - 275, roughly. These lanes are usually on the drier side but the SN's reaction was so bad, I was actually considering adding some surface. It's too early to do that, though.