win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Storm's Covers  (Read 974 times)

n00dlejester

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
  • The Dude Abides
Storm's Covers
« on: July 30, 2008, 02:47:32 AM »
Alright, here's a question for you Storm Troopers:  What exactly are the differences between the different variations of the Reactor coverstock? I'm looking both subjectively and objectively (I think those are the terms:  scientific and opinionated).

For me:

Reactor:  Longest, most "flip/skid" reaction
R2S:  A bit more mid-lane grab, not too much but enough to be noticed.  A smoother backend in general
R2X:  Earliest of the three, and easily the more predictable for me.
--------------------
Obviously, you aren''t a golfer.
Check out this blog
Logged
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

 

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Storm's Covers
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2008, 10:52:32 AM »
Basically you summed it up.  R2X handles more oil than R2S which handles more oil than Reactor.  Also, R2X is a lower absorbtion cover, so it will suck up less oil and last longer.  I don't work for Storm, I don't have any numbers, but that's the claim from the company plus the real-world results I've seen.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »