win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: questions on high performance  (Read 2057 times)

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
questions on high performance
« on: November 23, 2012, 02:07:44 PM »
Why was the Marvel Pearl more successful than the Marvel when the virtual gravity was more successful than the gravity shift? And I was wondering why the IQ tour is so popular even though it is a higher price points with the same cover stocks as the hot line series and the thunderline series
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: questions on high performance
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2012, 02:58:53 PM »
Why was the Marvel Pearl more successful than the Marvel when the virtual gravity was more successful than the gravity shift?

My 2 cents (FWIW):
As I see it, the Marvel solid is a strong oil loving ball with a even arcing, more gradual transition and ball reaction. This type of ball reaction is no longer popular with the general bowling population. They want the ball to do the work that the bowler who used to work at improving his bowling skills used to be responsible for.

The Virtual Gravity had the skid/hook, then make a left turn type of reaction that bowlers now want to see in their balls. So that only proper drilling is required to get this reaction and not proper bowler execution.

The Marvel Pearl has a very strong ball reaction over all, as a pearl should but also handles more oil than most pearls, so it is a good step down from balls like the Virtual Gravity and the newer Virtual Gravity Nano. It is also strong enough to allow crankers who need to handle heavier oils and who can't use strong solids, like the VG and the VG Nano.

Quote
And I was wondering why the IQ tour is so popular even though it is a higher price points with the same cover stocks as the hot line series and the thunderline series

The IQ is closer in overall reaction to the Marvel Solid, but with slightly more backend, but not a lot. It's still relatively even reacting.

The IQ Tour is a control ball but with a more expensive core, even though it has been treated to have a lower flare. New core molds are very expensive to produce; so manufacturers would like to get their money's worth from each one.

There are still many people who don't need all the strength (ball reaction) of balls like the Virtual Gravity Nano (Vivid, IQ, Modern Marvel, etc) either because they don't face as much oil or their ability allows them to use milder balls and they want or need the control of a ball like the IQ Tour. Storm has not had a ball like this since the Storm Tour Power 11 years ago: a strong coverstock, a low RG and and  low differential:
http://www.stormbowling.com/products/balls/classic/tour-power?search=&exclusiveClassic=false
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Rightycomplex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1250
Re: questions on high performance
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2012, 03:41:04 PM »
+1 with Charlest.

The high performance hockey stick is more popular than the early reading heavy rolling reaction. Guys want to cover boards rather than strike. Which is why the game gets so much harder using that type of reaction because the transitions are so sensitive and the margin for error is so small.
James C. Jones
Orbdrillers Pro Shop Holiday Bowl
Chester, Va.

Hammer Regional/Amateur Staff Member

www.facebook.com/orbdrillers
Orbdrillers.com
Hammerbowling.com