win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?  (Read 4093 times)

Ric Clint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« on: December 24, 2004, 05:54:54 PM »
It's on the Hot Rod ProStock Pearl, the Banshee, the Recharge, etc...

What does it do that is different from say Curelyon Pearl Reactive?



Logged

 

Ric Clint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #16 on: December 27, 2004, 05:14:30 PM »
quote:
FYI this is not a new discussion; it has been held before in this forum.


Really? I haven't seen it... I don't come to the Storm forum too often. Any idea what that post was titled so I can find it?




Logged

im4x4nut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #17 on: December 27, 2004, 10:00:41 PM »
quote:
I have balls with both Monsoon and Accutread and the Monsoon has more length and a sharper back-end than Accutread for me. The Accutread starts making it's move sooner and is still as strong or stronger, although not as snappy of break, on the back end as the Monsoon. The Accutread will handle carrydown better than Monsoon.....Note, this is how it works for me, but it may be different for others.
--------------------
STORM & BRUNSWICK are a perfect match for my style.


I could not agree more with you  Brickguy221   I also prefer Storm and Brunswick because I get a better roll and read on the lanes. I've thrown two of Storm's balls with the monsoon and didn't care for them. I should just buy three Original X-factors and drill them to give me three different looks and be done with it. My latest favorite is the Brunswick Smart Zone 1  Had it drilled for a strong mid lane roll because it looks like a plastic ball it's so shiny. Can't complain about the results though, I have shot over 700 with it more than i've shot below 700. Put a 300/800 series in the mix and it was well worth the price I paid for it. $95 drilled, what a steal.

I just wish that Storm would remake the Original Eraser. That ball was the BOMB.
Logged
http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a244/im4x4nut/?start=all
<b><font color=red>As with all things, this is my opinion. And we all know, opinions are like A-holes, we all have one. </font id=red></b>
<b>   </b>  <font color=red>   </font id=red>

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2004, 06:40:28 AM »
quote:
quote:
FYI this is not a new discussion; it has been held before in this forum.


Really? I haven't seen it... I don't come to the Storm forum too often. Any idea what that post was titled so I can find it?



No, sorry. It was in the range of 3-6 months ago.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2004, 02:34:18 PM »
A very good bowler friend of mine has the X Factor and the Triple X Factor. He uses the Triple XXX when there's too much oil for the X-Factor.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Ric Clint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2005, 08:38:38 PM »
quote:
Maybe the thing that is missing from this discussion is the block. The recharge has a taller block than the charge.


That is very true. With the weight block being taller in the Recharge, I guess that makes it go longer.



Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2005, 05:27:18 PM »
quote:
quote:
Maybe the thing that is missing from this discussion is the block. The recharge has a taller block than the charge.


That is very true. With the weight block being taller in the Recharge, I guess that makes it go longer.



From the theory I have heard, given by some reliable technical people, taller cores make the reaction have more of a skid/flip nature.

Rounder shaped cores tend to make the coverstock/ball more even reacting, smoother, by nature.

Plus the basic RG on the Power Charge is 2.49, vs the Recharge's 2.54. That's statistically significant.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Ric Clint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: What is this MONSOON Pearl coverstock?
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2005, 10:14:31 PM »
quote:
From the theory I have heard, given by some reliable technical people, taller cores make the reaction have more of a skid/flip nature.


Oh, that's kind of what I meant to say... I just didn't type it out.

And that makes sense, because for a ball to be skid/snap... it would have to get length in order to store up the energy to acheive that snap???

The Recharge is looking more and more appealing to me!






Edited on 1/15/2005 11:14 PM
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »