Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Storm
»
Virtual Gravity vs. Cell
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Virtual Gravity vs. Cell (Read 705 times)
solid 10
Jr. Member
Posts: 17
Virtual Gravity vs. Cell
«
on:
February 16, 2009, 08:48:00 AM »
Haven't seen much of either where I bowl but liked the look that Wiseman had at the masters yesterday during the first game (before he switched to rogue). Anybody have a comparison of two and opinion on what might be better to take to battle for the oil at nationals?
Logged
tvphotog
Hero Member
Posts: 731
Re: Virtual Gravity vs. Cell
«
Reply #1 on:
February 16, 2009, 05:30:19 PM »
VG = more length and more angular on the backend
Cell = more midlane and a rolly, smooth backend.
VG for nationals with about 2000 surface
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@windstream.net
Logged
Mike Thomas
@tvphotog17
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Storm
»
Virtual Gravity vs. Cell