win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Storm's urethane formulations  (Read 5670 times)

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24524
Storm's urethane formulations
« on: April 29, 2013, 08:56:00 AM »
So, with the intro of the SuperNatural, Storm is introducing their "U3S" urethane. I believe most modern "urethanes" either have some percentage of resin in them to allow more length and more backend than the first generation of urethanes from the 1970s, 80s and 90s, even though all manufacturers call them "urethane".

Storm says, in their Polar Ice descriptions, "U1S is a first generation material that is more controllable than U2Sâ„¢ which powers the popular Naturalâ„¢ series."

So does this mean or imply that the U3S coverstock on the SuperNatural have more resin in its formulation (if that is what is the difference in these newer urethane coverstocks) than the Natural's U2S coverstock?

Side comments:
I know the differences between these urethanes aren't huge; I'm more curious than anything else. I'll probably be ordering a Polar Ice to replace my polyester spare ball, as urethane is more sturdy than polyester. I may or may not order a SuperNatural; it sure is interesting. I'm surprised but delighted than Storm is spending so much money on all these urethanes, in what must be a very small market.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

 

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2013, 09:50:24 AM »
Quote
I'll probably be ordering a Polar Ice to replace my polyester spare ball, as urethane is more sturdy than polyester.

Good choice Jeff.  Agreed much less prone to cracking over time than poly.

I'd also like to know more about the new Storm "U3S" urethane cover and how it differs.
Scott

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2013, 10:59:37 AM »
Im digging that new "mix" ball coming out...U1S cover...looks cool too
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

lifted rillo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 312
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2013, 12:47:02 PM »
Polar Ice might be a bargain as soon as those Mixes come out.

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2013, 02:13:53 PM »
U3S should polish easier.

LazyK

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2013, 03:38:55 PM »
I ordered one of the Supernatural at local pro shop. Should have it on the 15th. Storm mentioned it has U3S hybrid urethane so I thought the U3S name was made instead of calling it U2S hybrid(just guesses). Around 2-3 years ago before I stopped bowling till now, barely saw anyone throw urethane except few people with original Natural. Today I see many with urethane in bag, pro shop also stocks 3+ different urethanes. I think the urethane market can grow bigger, I see more bowlers ditching polyester for urethane and those hammer polyester with strong cores.

brookzy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 18
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2013, 05:21:54 PM »
I ordered one of the Supernatural at local pro shop. Should have it on the 15th. Storm mentioned it has U3S hybrid urethane so I thought the U3S name was made instead of calling it U2S hybrid(just guesses). Around 2-3 years ago before I stopped bowling till now, barely saw anyone throw urethane except few people with original Natural. Today I see many with urethane in bag, pro shop also stocks 3+ different urethanes. I think the urethane market can grow bigger, I see more bowlers ditching polyester for urethane and those hammer polyester with strong cores.

Totally agree with that. Urethanes seem to have rocketed in the last year or so. And not just on one group of bowlers - it's in high rev, low rev, young, old...

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24524
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2013, 09:12:26 PM »
I ordered one of the Supernatural at local pro shop. Should have it on the 15th. Storm mentioned it has U3S hybrid urethane so I thought the U3S name was made instead of calling it U2S hybrid(just guesses). Around 2-3 years ago before I stopped bowling till now, barely saw anyone throw urethane except few people with original Natural. Today I see many with urethane in bag, pro shop also stocks 3+ different urethanes. I think the urethane market can grow bigger, I see more bowlers ditching polyester for urethane and those hammer polyester with strong cores.

Totally agree with that. Urethanes seem to have rocketed in the last year or so. And not just on one group of bowlers - it's in high rev, low rev, young, old...

I have to believe that U3S in the SuperNatural is a different formulation than the U2S in the Natural.

I haven't seen an increase in the use of Urethanes locally. (I'd like to, though.)
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2013, 08:53:42 AM »
My natural for me is at best a good spare ball!  Mine is drilled strong just like the lefties in the hammer videos for their Blue Hammer.  Usually a big strong drilling for me!  Mine is left out of box surface.

A friend of mine with a similar roll from the right is tearing it up with his Blue Hammer(new design and core).  On the same shot or a shot that I view as even less sparky than our side.  He has striking power.  I have less striking power with my Natural than I do with my plastic spare ball.   

I think his is polished.

Regards,

Luckylefty
PS note often my old Sonic X is too much for this shot!
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2013, 03:58:04 PM »
I drilled out the original Natural when the first came out.  Hadn't planned on using it for a spare ball, but I actually like it for spares better than polyester.  Less squirty in the heads, and gives a small but very predictable move coming off fresh strips.

As a strike ball I think urethane, until recently, has been very under utilized, especially by staighter players.  As a low rev senior, I find use for it on very wet dry house patterns, and short tournament patterns.  Carry can be excellent when you dont try to open up the lane, but instead take advantage of the ability to square up outside. 

One interesting side note is the amount of oil that a urethane ball will absorb.  I have soaked the oil out of mine at least 3 times and guys are amazed how much it gives up.  It may be the result of some resin additives, but I know from experience that even the old blue hammers soaked up oil, we just didnt realize it back then.

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24524
Re: Storm's urethane formulations
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2013, 09:15:57 PM »
Since no one is actually commenting on the topic, I'm locking it.

Why do people just say the first thing off the top of their heads, when it has noting to do with the thread's topic??
"None are so blind as those who will not see."