win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: 715C vs 607A SE  (Read 1154 times)

Laniarty

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
715C vs 607A SE
« on: July 10, 2010, 02:52:02 AM »
I'm looking for a ball to use as a benchmark and for a look on medium to medium/heavy conditions. I like what I've seen and read about both these balls, but what differences would I see on the lanes given the same drilling?

PAP 5>1/4^
250-300 Revs
~18-19MPH
Logged

 

dark_rising76

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
Re: 715C vs 607A SE
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2010, 11:00:11 AM »
Both will give you a different reaction. 715C gives you a midlane arc with controllable backend and the 607A will give you length with an angular backend. If you go on Track's website and look at the videos you will see the contrast between them.
Logged

Billy Ray

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 984
Re: 715C vs 607A SE
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2010, 11:38:23 AM »
The 715C is my Benchmark ball. Readable and controllable plus it hits too.
--------------------
Billy Ray
Track Pro Staff
Owner Rays Pro Shop
At The Playdium
"Let Us Help You Become More Competitive"
Logged
Billy Ray
Track Pro Staff
Owner Rays Pro Shop
Inside Sparetime Lanes-East Greenbush
"Let Us Help You Become More Competitive"

utopia6

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: 715C vs 607A SE
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2010, 12:20:45 PM »
I also have the 715C.  It is drilled RICO and at 2000 abralon.  Unbelievable hit.  It is my ball for heavier volumn patterns.  If left out of box, it was really good for the standard house shot, but I have my Kinetic Pearl and Nomad for that.  My wife has the 715A, which Im guessing can't be much different than the 607A.  It is pretty skid/snappy.  I'd go with the 715C if you want a smoother reaction over the 607A.  This is my link of the 715C if you want to its reaction with the RICO drill.  http://www.youtube.com/user/masterchief247#p/a/u/2/Shw3RSzHddo
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »