BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Track => Topic started by: gokenong on May 03, 2007, 07:46:51 PM

Title: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
Post by: gokenong on May 03, 2007, 07:46:51 PM
which one's better?? on heavy oil??
Title: Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
Post by: tvphotog on May 04, 2007, 07:07:05 AM
No Mercy is a best at 1000 or 2000 grit. Good midlane and just keeps coming..
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Title: Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
Post by: tvphotog on May 04, 2007, 01:43:09 PM
You would probably get more responses if you put the thread in the correct forum. Why is it in Track? You're asking about Ebonite, Hammer and Columbia balls !!
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Title: Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
Post by: shipper50 on May 04, 2007, 01:47:56 PM
quote:
You would probably get more responses if you put the thread in the correct forum. Why is it in Track? You're asking about Ebonite, Hammer and Columbia balls !!
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net


I think if you read the headline it says somewhere MM. Could be for Mean Machine, which is a Track ball if my memory is correct?

Shipper
Title: Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
Post by: charlest on May 04, 2007, 06:33:23 PM
quote:
which one's better?? on heavy oil??


You already posted an "Action Max vs the Total NV" post somewhere else.

Stop replicating your requests.

Action Max generally = Mean Machine.

The TNV is not in the same class as either with repsect to handling oil. PERIOD. End of FREAKING story!
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."