win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Arsenal Reactive and AI  (Read 857 times)

C-G ProShop-Carl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5825
Arsenal Reactive and AI
« on: January 01, 2006, 11:56:17 AM »
When the Arsenal Reactive was released word was that Track did several tests and you cannot tell the difference in reaction via a computer. Did anyone do a side by side test of their own and what did you find?
I am curious, because I have done a few tests and find that the Arsenal Reactive is a tad bit stronger in oil with the same coverstock as the AI. A kid I coach plays similiar to what I normally do and we threw them side by side.

What were your findings?

-Carl
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Amateur/Pro Shop Staff

www.trackbowling.com

www.startabowlingrevolution.com


Tag Team Member #1
Carl Hurd

Austintown Ohio (Wedgewood Lanes)

900 Global, AMF Staff Bowler

Tag Team Member #1

<b><i>TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!</i></b>/

 

Dysturbed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: Arsenal Reactive and AI
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2006, 04:39:45 PM »
Is the AI you are talking about the Absolute Inferno?If you are than I would say the Arsenal is a bit stronger atleast in med-heavy oil.  My bowling partner has one and are games are similar he might even have a little bit more hand than me but when I play the Arsenal I cover a little more boards than him.  My drilling is strong and I dont know how his AI is drilled but like I said judging by this I would say the Reactive is a bit stronger.