Guys,
Let me say this much. It was never my contention that the informed, higher level players wouldn't get, or take to, the new system. These are the players who want a ball because of reactions, not "coolness". These are not the people I was speaking of in my replies that had me questioning the new system.
Regional players, and staff members, can usually be counted on to relay the truth about balls and their reactions. Staff members lose credibility if they lie about that, and regional players lose money if they use "junk". If a staff member says it's great, and the regional players are successful with it, odds are it really is a good piece.
The ONLY segment of the buyers I was concerned with was the recreational/occasional bowler who is going to buy a ball or two each season, and I was/am afraid that the new naming system WILL NOT/WOULD NOT be a very strong selling point. Much of the public has moved past the sheer "greatness" of a piece of equipment, and on to whether the ball is "popular" among HIS peers. After all, on a THS, how "great" of a ball do you really need? I mean, most manufacturers make entry level and midline stuff MORE than capapble of conquering those shots, don't they. Having the highest performance, "greatest" ball is akin to catching 5lb fish with 100lb test line to me. You really don't need it, and many consumers have started to figure that out.
Yes, your TRACK equipment may be really great. And the "real" players may have great success with it, I hope they do. But, I am also afraid that TRACK is not in the forefront of regular consumers minds, and the new naming system is doing nothing to help.
Now, me? I wouldn't mind having one of those 505C's. I love predictable, controlled reactions. And names mean little to me.
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein