win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: action max vs. MM vs. TNV  (Read 644 times)

gokenong

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 258
action max vs. MM vs. TNV
« on: May 03, 2007, 07:46:51 PM »
which one's better?? on heavy oil??
Logged

 

tvphotog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2007, 07:07:05 AM »
No Mercy is a best at 1000 or 2000 grit. Good midlane and just keeps coming..
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Logged
Mike Thomas
@tvphotog17

tvphotog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2007, 01:43:09 PM »
You would probably get more responses if you put the thread in the correct forum. Why is it in Track? You're asking about Ebonite, Hammer and Columbia balls !!
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Logged
Mike Thomas
@tvphotog17

shipper50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1228
Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2007, 01:47:56 PM »
quote:
You would probably get more responses if you put the thread in the correct forum. Why is it in Track? You're asking about Ebonite, Hammer and Columbia balls !!
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net


I think if you read the headline it says somewhere MM. Could be for Mean Machine, which is a Track ball if my memory is correct?

Shipper
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: action max vs. MM vs. TNV
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2007, 06:33:23 PM »
quote:
which one's better?? on heavy oil??


You already posted an "Action Max vs the Total NV" post somewhere else.

Stop replicating your requests.

Action Max generally = Mean Machine.

The TNV is not in the same class as either with repsect to handling oil. PERIOD. End of FREAKING story!
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »