Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Track
»
"Equation" comparison
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: "Equation" comparison (Read 1306 times)
burly
Sr. Member
Posts: 327
"Equation" comparison
«
on:
October 18, 2006, 11:52:33 AM »
how does the equation compare to the Crunch Time?
is the equation longer?
Edited on 10/18/2006 7:51 PM
Logged
C-G ProShop-Carl
Hero Member
Posts: 5825
Re: "Equation" comparison
«
Reply #1 on:
October 18, 2006, 08:42:30 PM »
Equation is longer (much longer in my opinion) and has more movement off of the backends.
Carl
--------------------
Carl Hurd
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio
Track Intl.-Amateur/Pro Shop Staff
www.trackbowling.com
Tag Team Member #1
TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!
Logged
Carl Hurd
Austintown Ohio (Wedgewood Lanes)
900 Global, AMF Staff Bowler
Tag Team Member #1
<b><i>TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!</i></b>/
burly
Sr. Member
Posts: 327
Re: "Equation" comparison
«
Reply #2 on:
October 18, 2006, 09:30:46 PM »
good to know
i just receive an equation and now i know to drill it pin under
i am looking for continuous backend.
--------------------
###############################################
check my profile for my stats
Logged
Slopsurprise
Hero Member
Posts: 2100
Re: "Equation" comparison
«
Reply #3 on:
October 18, 2006, 10:31:35 PM »
The Equation is contiuous by nature IMO.
Logged
burly
Sr. Member
Posts: 327
Re: "Equation" comparison
«
Reply #4 on:
October 19, 2006, 01:58:49 AM »
good to know
--------------------
###############################################
check my profile for my stats
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Track
»
"Equation" comparison