win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: no more numbering system?  (Read 13280 times)

Dave81644

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
no more numbering system?
« on: April 26, 2015, 09:22:00 AM »
couple new pieces don't have the numbers...
interesting change.
i used alot of the early numbered pieces and i could follow it for the most part until the 9 series stuff was weaker than the 7 series
but, the 5 and 7 series stuff was some great pieces
505t and 715t especially, for me anyways
Logged

 

rvmark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2015, 08:45:00 PM »
I have had success with Track over the past 4 seasons and still keep my 300C Pearl in the bag along with a Tour X. 

Mark
Logged

loose5682

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1466
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #17 on: April 28, 2015, 09:55:57 AM »
The numbering system is still in play to a point...

HX (high rev), MX (medium rev), and LX (low rev) refer to the style of bowler that the ball is intended to roll better for

05, 10, and 16 still refer to the strength of the intermediate differential (Mass Bias) of the ball

There will still be releases outside of this system (Tour X, Tour SiC) which will serve the purpose of the "limited edition" balls of the past, like the 400A and 607A

Hopefully this helps!  If you have any more questions, please let me know!
Logged
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #18 on: April 28, 2015, 10:11:58 AM »
Isnt it a bad idea to have a ball listed for a high rev medium rev or low rev player? Why limit a ball or bowler on something they can use.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

EL3MCNEIL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #19 on: April 28, 2015, 11:15:21 AM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on April 28, 2015, 10:11:58 AM
Isnt it a bad idea to have a ball listed for a high rev medium rev or low rev player? Why limit a ball or bowler on something they can use.

I'd have to agree. Putting a label like that could dissuade someone from purchasing a ball because they believe that it's not meant for them. But at the same time that labeling method does offer the bowler additional information that could be of use to them.
Logged
"Nothing is real, everything is permitted"
-Assassin's Creed

JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #20 on: April 28, 2015, 11:24:26 AM »
Quote from: EL3MCNEIL on April 28, 2015, 11:15:21 AM
Quote from: kidlost2000 on April 28, 2015, 10:11:58 AM
Isnt it a bad idea to have a ball listed for a high rev medium rev or low rev player? Why limit a ball or bowler on something they can use.

I'd have to agree. Putting a label like that could dissuade someone from purchasing a ball because they believe that it's not meant for them. But at the same time that labeling method does offer the bowler additional information that could be of use to them.

I agree.  I think they were going after "smart bowling types" but missed out on the majority of the bowling world.  For instance I told my wife she should try an HX05 and she kept insisting that the LX16/10/05 should be for her because she didn't have high revs (but she was rev dominant because of her speed).  If anything, I preferred the numbering name scheme better than the high/medium/low rev than they currently have.
Logged

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #21 on: April 28, 2015, 11:39:30 AM »
Any of those balls can be used for any bowler depending on the condition and desired reaction.  Putting the int diff in the ball name is useless because smart and dumb bowlers alike have no idea what it means.  Most proshops arent much better.

When tournament bowlers put together a track arsenal are they limiting their self based on a name or will they be smart enough to look past it like others as well.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5463
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #22 on: April 28, 2015, 11:48:54 AM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on April 28, 2015, 10:11:58 AM
Isnt it a bad idea to have a ball listed for a high rev medium rev or low rev player? Why limit a ball or bowler on something they can use.

It was a somewhat interesting experiment,  but I saw too many people that focused on the name instead of looking at the actual strength of each ball.

From weakest to strongest from what I saw and rolled:

HX05, MX05, HX10, LX05, MX10, HX16, LX10, MX16, LX16
Logged

soonerdallas

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #23 on: April 30, 2015, 06:17:07 PM »
If there going away from the number system any chance the 3 new balls are the ones on the April approved ball list. Power machine, freak out, and exception 6.0 maybe try and make a splash with some updated remakes. I doubt it but it would be awesome!
Logged
We are the diamonds that chose to stay coal

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2015, 06:18:46 PM »
Quote from: soonerdallas on April 30, 2015, 06:17:07 PM
If there going away from the number system any chance the 3 new balls are the ones on the April approved ball list. Power machine, freak out, and exception 6.0 maybe try and make a splash with some updated remakes. I doubt it but it would be awesome!

I tell you what, if they re-make the Freak Out, I'm all over it.
Logged
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

soonerdallas

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2015, 06:33:51 PM »
My first 800 was with a freak out. And I loved the exception and power machine. It would be cool if it happened!
Logged
We are the diamonds that chose to stay coal

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2015, 06:43:17 PM »
Quote from: soonerdallas on April 30, 2015, 06:33:51 PM
My first 800 was with a freak out. And I loved the exception and power machine. It would be cool if it happened!

Power Machine and Freak Out had cult followings, makes sense using those names to jumpstart the brand again.
Logged
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

EL3MCNEIL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2015, 07:58:01 PM »
If they brought back the Xception, they would have my money faster that I could withdraw it.
Logged
"Nothing is real, everything is permitted"
-Assassin's Creed

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #28 on: April 30, 2015, 09:06:55 PM »
I loved Track when it was made in San Antonio
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

billdozer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4613
  • Goin' Global!
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2015, 10:43:07 PM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on April 30, 2015, 09:06:55 PM
I loved Track when it was made in San Antonio

This^
Logged
In the bag [Infinite Physix, Volatility Torque, Night Road, Phaze III, Burner Solid, Hustle AU]
*Now Testing* IQ Ruby, Renevant, another IQ Tour solid
Coming soon...???

tkkshop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1173
Re: no more numbering system?
« Reply #30 on: May 02, 2015, 09:34:43 AM »
What does Track call it's followers?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
« previous next »