BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Track => Topic started by: Rantings on December 13, 2004, 03:10:44 AM

Title: Slash vs. Atomic Charge
Post by: Rantings on December 13, 2004, 03:10:44 AM
Anyone can give details about the reaction differences or even sameness.
--------------------
Bowling is for sissies..ask Bones...
Title: Re: Slash vs. Atomic Charge
Post by: C-G ProShop-Carl on December 14, 2004, 10:46:50 PM
Rantings, I am not really able to comment much on the reaction of the Atomic Charge, but the Slash is an awesome ball. Scroll through a couple of pages and read my mini review. Every time I get a chance to throw this ball I like it more and more


-EX-
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Advisory Staff

Title: Re: Slash vs. Atomic Charge
Post by: clintdaley on December 16, 2004, 07:30:44 AM
Slash is an awesome ball. Gives a consistent reaction and more importantly, a "readable" reaction. The ball does the same thing over and over. Exactly what a bowler wants. The Atomic should start earlier due to its RG and more aggressive cover, but from what I have seen, you need a lot of speed or lots of oil or both to get the Atomic to the pocket to hit, otherwise it hits like a pumpkin. This observation is based for the one Atomic I received from Storm through the VIP program. The Slash on the other hand is great for almost all styles. I have seen people with no hand use it with success and people hooking the lane with it and having success.

Not saying the Atomic will not work, just the Slash is more user friendly and will cover more conditions than the Atomic.

Clint
--------------------
Clint Daley-Owner
Lets Go Bowling Daley
Salem, Ohio 44460
TRACK ADVISORY PRO SHOP STAFF