win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Mini Review: Freakazoid #2  (Read 1171 times)

C-G ProShop-Carl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5825
Mini Review: Freakazoid #2
« on: October 07, 2004, 04:34:19 PM »
Ball: having my other freakazoid drilled more for length, I wanted to try to get this one into a roll a bit sooner. I drilled this one 3 1/4 x 4, I left the surface box

Lane Conditions: 38ft buffed to 44ft, heavy oil in the middle and it tapers as it goes to the outside, wood lanes

Line: I tried this Freakazoid all over the lane, I had a decent shot in most places, but I decided that for tonight the best line was going to be taking a bit of hand out of the ball and playing straight up the boards...between 11 and 9 boards. I also had a good line playing deep inside, but the straighter line was taking out the corners better tonight.

Reaction: Comparing it to Freakazoid #1, this one gets into a roll much sooner, probably 4-5 ft sooner. Getting into an early roll does not make the FaZ lose anything on the backends. The transition from skid, roll, hook is smooth throughout for this ball.

Impact: Same same here as with FaZ #1.....strong hit, and the pins stay low. Playing straighter if I let up even a hair the ball was going high.....but it kept the pins so low that I was able to trip the 4 pin on probably 6 shot tonight.

Readability: Watching the smooth transition of FaZ #2, this ball would be a very good ball to read the lanes with. I have stated many times before that I really love smooth reacting balls to read the lanes with. Most of the time they allow you to see the transition from heavy oil to buffed oil to dry backends. FaZ#2 gives just that.

Overall: The Freakazoid is a ball that I believe will please most any bowler and bowling style. It seems alot like the Sheer Havoc to me in that it does what you drill it to do. Drill it for length and it will give it to you, drill it for early roll and you will get that reaction. A definate winner from Track. In my other mini on the FaZ...I stated this was not a release I was overly excited about....and with each I have found a ball that makes an awesome first ball out of the bag kind of ball.

Once more games are put on it I will post a final review
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Advisory Staff

Carl Hurd

Austintown Ohio (Wedgewood Lanes)

900 Global, AMF Staff Bowler

Tag Team Member #1

<b><i>TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!</i></b>/

 

dw23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Mini Review: Freakazoid #2
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2004, 03:39:53 PM »
Ex.
Do you think you could get the length of the Crash with the Freak-A-Zoid with the same cover prep? I have both balls but the problem I have with the Crash is that it can be a little aggressive off the dry sometime and leave big splits. The FAZ seems to roll-out and hold off so you may leave a weak 10 pin but less splits.

Just trying to figure out the difference between the two balls before I decide which one to take to tournaments this weekend. I'm also thinking about going with a couple of Columbia balls (I don't believe i'm saying this) for med-light to light oil conditions due to the gap in Tracks current line up.

Thanks for your review and comments.
DW
Deven Walls

Pro Shop Staff Member
Lord Field/Lane Masters
www.lordfield.com and www.lane-masters.com
"Changing Bowling, One Bowler At A Time"

C-G ProShop-Carl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5825
Re: Mini Review: Freakazoid #2
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2004, 04:16:46 PM »
DW....read my first freakazoid mini

With the thought that coverstock is a vast majority of the reaction a ball will have, I would say yes, you can get similiar length. I would not worry about the Freakazoid not finishing strong enough. It will probably not jump as strong off of the dry as the Crash.

I would say give it a try. I didn't expect the kind of reaction out of the first FaZ that I got, I expect it to be a bit more tame. You can see it get into a good roll, but it still finished strong. It will have the length that the pattern will allow it.

I hope this helps, if not let me know and I will try to word it a different way.

-EX-
--------------------
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Advisory Staff

Carl Hurd

Austintown Ohio (Wedgewood Lanes)

900 Global, AMF Staff Bowler

Tag Team Member #1

<b><i>TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!</i></b>/

BackToBasics

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1110
Re: Mini Review: Freakazoid #2
« Reply #3 on: October 09, 2004, 12:48:51 PM »
As long as there's enough head oil, you can achieve similar lengths but if you start encountering drying heads, the FAZ will not push as easy as the Crash.  At that point, the FAZ's core will start to take over as it's very early revving.  Even at the same surface, the Crash will be very angular at the break.

I will add this.  My wife just drilled up a Freak-A-Zoid and she also has a Dry Heat.  The Dry Heat, is about 3-4 boards weaker than the FAZ and much smoother.  Just something to consider for med-lite conditions.

dw23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Mini Review: Freakazoid #2
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2004, 05:01:03 AM »
Thanks Guys,
I polished the FAZ and it pushed extremely easy but the backend is still huge. The Crash is still better for med to light. I tried 4 Dry Heats and I can't get them to roll off of the fingers. I really need a pearl in the spot under the Crash. Again, Thanks for letting me bounce ideas off everyone.
DW
Deven Walls

Pro Shop Staff Member
Lord Field/Lane Masters
www.lordfield.com and www.lane-masters.com
"Changing Bowling, One Bowler At A Time"