BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Track => Topic started by: thedjs on August 16, 2014, 01:56:37 PM

Title: Tour X vs 300C and Columbia Eruption Pro
Post by: thedjs on August 16, 2014, 01:56:37 PM

How close, if at all, would the new Tour X be to these balls?  I know it's a pearl and the other two are solids.

Title: Re: Tour X vs 300C and Columbia Eruption Pro
Post by: SVstar34 on August 16, 2014, 02:20:13 PM

If you're talking about the original 300c pearl that ball is weaker than the other two. If you're talking about the 300C solid, that will be similar to the Epro and the Tour X should be the most angular of the group being a pearl

Title: Re: Tour X vs 300C and Columbia Eruption Pro
Post by: thedjs on August 16, 2014, 05:02:08 PM

Quote from: SVstar34 on August 16, 2014, 02:20:13 PM

If you're talking about the original 300c pearl that ball is weaker than the other two. If you're talking about the 300C solid, that will be similar to the Epro and the Tour X should be the most angular of the group being a pearl

   



Thanks.  That's what I was looking for.