win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: coverstocks  (Read 1196 times)

millt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
coverstocks
« on: January 01, 2007, 10:05:17 AM »
whats the difference between reactive pearl and reactive solid. And how does reactive pearl, reactive solid, particle pearl, and particle solid; stack up in performance and durability. thanks

 

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: coverstocks
« Reply #1 on: January 01, 2007, 07:29:18 PM »
Pretty much every ball today starts with a reactive resin cover.  There can be one or more additives to it to affect the way it reacts.  Pearlization (finely ground mica) will stiffen the coverstock, giving less in contact with the lane, and thus giving length and less reaction in oil (pearl reactives are almost always polished, enhancing that).  "Solid" means "not pearl".

Particles (glass or silicate beads, except possibly Legends' Diamond particle, I'm not sure what that is) are like studs on snow tires (not an original analogy).  They provide more bite in oil and smooth out the reaction off the dry.  Heavier loads increase that effect, lighter loads are closer to ordinary reactives.  A particle coverstock can be pearl or solid by adding (or not) the pearlization.

In general, for a given coverstock, you have pearl reactives with the most length and backend, then solid reactives and particle pearls (they can be very similar), then solid particles as the earliest and smoothest.  Generally.  That's also the (very rough) order in oil handling, from least to most.

As far as durability goes, it depends on the manufacturer, the type of particles used, and the oil conditions.  Some early particles were soft, hollow glass beads.  When they broke apart and wore smooth, the reaction was gone.  Resurfacing was tough because sanding tended to wear them down as well.  Others were harder, sharper, and more durable, and so they lasted longer.  Most particles today are pretty long-lived, and will last almost as long as their non-particle counterparts.  Further, pretty much every manufacturer has some kind of "long-lasting" reactive base (Soaker, Activator, M80, Reactor, most Legends/Lanemasters covers), and so durability isn't a major issue.  The balls last longer than most people want to throw them (they get new-ball-itis first).

SH

JOE FALCO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6298
Re: coverstocks
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2007, 07:58:13 PM »
Shelley .. I thought the info you provided was great .. I took the liberty of PRINTING so I can refer to it later .. hope you don't mind!
--------------------
Hit them light and watch them fight
      J O E - F A L C O
RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones!

tenpinspro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4161
Re: coverstocks
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2007, 07:41:08 AM »
In addition to shelley's great info, I'd like to add my 2 cents on what I call studs.  Storm introduced MICA in their particle balls (Sky Bolt comes to mind) about 9-10 years ago where the MICA was physically present (looked a little like glitter) on the surface of the ball and when that portion of the ball made contact with the lane, it collapsed back into the ball. The remaining MICA pieces before the and after the physical contact was made was still sticking out hitting the lane, thus creating a larger "footprint" on the lane for better traction.  That's what I call studs....
--------------------
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Track Intl. - Amateur/Pro Shop Staff  
Vise Inserts Staff
www.Trackbowling.com

See profile for Track Ball videos

*El Presidente of the Track Legion

Edited on 1/2/2007 9:17 AM
Rick Leong - Ten Pins Pro Shop
Co-Founder - Tag Team Coaching
"El" Presidente of the Legion

millt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: coverstocks
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2007, 04:07:06 PM »
thanks to everyone you've been alot of help.