Like I said, over and over when this all started, I don't think giving balls a number for a "name" is a good idea, as far as pure marketability goes.
Now, Track is even having to come out with a video, specifically designed to inform bowlers about the naming system, in spite of my being told over and over that "Track is designed and targeted at the more advanced, more knowledgable, "serious" bowlers who care more about performance than about the name". I was also told those people would "get it" because it was a simple system.
People don't want numbers, people want "COOL". The name "BLACK WIDOW" was "COOL" and sold a TON of balls (still is). The name "VIRTUAL GRAVITY" was "COOL" and sold a TON of balls (still is). 930T, 715A, and 505C are not "COOL" (unless you're a statistics nerd, and then you're probably not bowling).
--------------------
Good transactions list in my profile
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein