Author Topic: Equation2 Results (Read 3890 times)

C-G ProShop-Carl · « **on:** December 28, 2006, 03:52:22 PM »

Due to the traffic on the other thread I figured I would start another one on this one.

I put a very similiar layout on this ball that I had on the original. It is cleaner through the front of the lane, a tad less in the midlane with about a foot or so overall more length than the original. The backend reaction is very comparable with IMO the Equation2 having a tad bit more movement off of friction.

So its placement would be below the original Equation. Another ball to compare it to is the Heat. It is under the Heat as well. The good thing about this ball is that it has enough recovery in the backends to allow the bowler to move inside when the track area starts to go....but still make it back to the hole.

-Carl
--------------------
Carl Hurd
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Amateur/Pro Shop Staff
www.trackbowling.com

Tag Team Member #1

TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!

C-G ProShop-Carl · « **Reply #16 on:** February 14, 2007, 08:20:18 PM »

You could try to put a coat of Magic Shine over the surface...that may help it retain more energy for down lane. Generally leverage layouts cause a ball to rev so much though that it may do very little to only add polish.

-Carl
--------------------
Carl Hurd
C-G Pro Shop (owner/operator)
Youngstown Ohio

Track Intl.-Amateur/Pro Shop Staff
www.trackbowling.com

Tag Team Member #1

TAG TEAM COACHING!!!!!!/Co-Founder

Author Topic: Equation2 Results (Read 3890 times)

C-G ProShop-Carl

Equation2 Results

C-G ProShop-Carl

Re: Equation2 Results