Author Topic: MX16, no reviews, very few comments (Read 14844 times)

LuckyLefty · « **on:** May 23, 2018, 04:54:49 PM »

Hey Tracksters!

I have seen lots of reviews and loving comments on the LX16, same core! I have also noted the great Paradox has the almost the same core!

Any thoughts or opinions. The one or two videos I have seen make it look like almost a mostly solid hybrid with a very rounded move. I had a ball I loved like this because of it's smoothness, my Brunswick C System 3.5. Boy was that readable and smooth on fresh.

The MX16? Any opinions?

Regards,

Luckylefty

SVstar34 · « **Reply #1 on:** May 23, 2018, 05:06:10 PM »

I had one for a little bit but didn't have enough oil to use it. It seemed like the cover was maybe a little too weak and that was the same issue with the HX16 where it just didn't matchup great for most bowlers like the Paradox series with stronger covers.

The LX16 was definitely a more rounded shape for most as well. I think you'd be better served with a Legion Solid that I saw everywhere at tournaments and people still horde today

billdozer · « **Reply #2 on:** May 23, 2018, 05:06:41 PM »

No one bought it because that's when tracks numbering system got all super Goofy

LuckyLefty · « **Reply #3 on:** May 23, 2018, 05:48:45 PM »

Bill,

Your right! Much love for sexy Marketing oriented names! Yet, Some seemed to love the same cored, LX16! Now I love it, and all those bad names!!!, because someone Gave it too me!

Now the same core in the Paradoxes....LOVE! Anyone?

Regards,

Luckylefty

Author Topic: MX16, no reviews, very few comments (Read 14844 times)

LuckyLefty

MX16, no reviews, very few comments

SVstar34

Re: MX16, no reviews, very few comments

billdozer

Re: MX16, no reviews, very few comments

LuckyLefty

Re: MX16, no reviews, very few comments