win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Up-Rising vs. Rising, etc  (Read 1183 times)

JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Up-Rising vs. Rising, etc
« on: June 06, 2008, 04:25:21 AM »
So where will the Up-Rising fit in the lineup?
Logged

 

louf846

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: Up-Rising vs. Rising, etc
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2008, 12:42:37 PM »
The people that have thrown them probably can't comment on them yet and the people that haven't can only speculate. I would have to assume it will retain energy a little better. There is a commercial for it on the Track website. Check it out. Once we get them and can give you some real world analysis, we will be sure to do so. I am stoked about this ball.
--------------------
Louis Franzetti

Track Regional Staff Member
Logged

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
Re: Up-Rising vs. Rising, etc
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2008, 06:07:14 PM »
From what I know, the uprising is polished so energy will be retained longer and it may be more skid/flip instead of skid/roll like the original Rising
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Twisted Fury
Raw Hammer Pain
Blue Vibe

Logged

louf846

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: Up-Rising vs. Rising, etc
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2008, 08:01:08 PM »
It does have a new coverstock in addition to being polished. The polish alone will help aid in the length.
On a 15 pound ball, the RG is a little lower at 2.48. The Rising was 2.50. The diff on a 15 pound is slightly higher, .056 versus .052 and the int diff, or core strength very slightly higher at .032 versus .031. These are the number right off the web site. Core numbers are ever so slightly different but with the slight changes and the new coverstock, should make for one hell of a ride!
--------------------
Louis Franzetti

Track Regional Staff Member
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »