No, what I'm in favor of is, and this is a very basic concept, but to have different divisions of bowling. One where the shot can be whatever they want, any equipment they want. And another where there are both restrictions on equipment and lane conditions. And those that CHOOSE to bowl in the higher division will be given more credit, for lack of a better term, than those in the lower.
But please re-read your second paragraph. The BOWLERS signed up for the rotating shot league,(which sounds like a good concept to me) then the BOWLERS cried about it when it was too tough, so the OWNER caved because he was didn't want to lose his Customers. Based on your experience, I feel it is unfair to blame the ABC.
Glen Allison shot 900, score rejected becuase of illegal lanes. someone I bowl with shot 5 300's, I think, in one season back in the Uerathane days, all rejected because of illegal lane conditions. Bowlers complained it wasn't fair that they be penalized because of what the house did so the ABC caved and doesn't nullify scores because of the condition. Too many people want high scores, and fair semi difficult lane conditions. I don't think you can have both.