I can see and understand both sides of this issue. Both sides seem to agree that perfect is really not going to happen. Although the perfect situation will never exist, why not try to improve the current procedure?
If the proposed new procedures help to level the playing field, then it should be a step in the right direction. Again, maybe a completely level playing field isn't possible, but as it stands if you follow the wrong group of bowlers it can make a difficult pattern very difficult. It happened to me a few years back, and I vowed to never again bowl that (11:30am) minors squad again. The heads were scorched and the back ends were extremely touchy between washout or Brooklyn (or worse). Other bowlers on the same squad who followed different groups had a lot of "forgiveness" on the lanes and were scoring well. I had to compete against them in brackets as well as the regular tournament competition.
The Open is fun for me. I like the challenge of a more demanding shot, as long as the people I am competing against have the same demanding condition to start with. If they are adept at creating area for themselves on the lanes, then great. The Open also can be quite expensive by the time you add the entry fee, travel costs, hotel costs, meals, souvenirs, you name it. If there is a way to find equity on the lanes then I am for it.
Again. Granted that even with fresh oil it isn't a perfect situation, if it is a step in the right direction then why not give it a try? If it does not accomplish it's goal, the USBC can scrap it and go back to the current procedures, or anything else they can think of between now and then. I am not taking sides on this issue, except to say what have we got to lose by trying it?
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff
www.brunswickbowling.comThe opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.