Let's make it really fair and adopt the idea of another poster who suggested that each team bowl on a single lane all 3 games.
Concur. It's common sense. You're not bowling against the team across from you so there isn't a point to crossing. It gives your team total control of the lane. No excuses. No random companion teams. No benefit to having 10 players playing the same way. Unless you're going to put one team per pair of lanes, (which isn't logical spacing wise) it makes total sense to go to one lane.
I'll say it again, but by going to fresh for all squads, singles and doubles, who you follow to some extent matters more than how you throw the ball and this change by USBC essentially admits that it matters too much. Obviously, you can't suck, but give a good player 2-3 boards of miss room and he'll eat it up. Make him split boards and it's a pretty significant dropoff. Two years ago, we had a mess on our doubles pair and I thought, this is it, this is going to cost us bigtime. We struggled to get anything going, but our spare games were on point and we fought for a 1206. When we moved to our singles pair (same equipment, roughly the same line) my partner and I shot 1477 as a duo, which was worth jack dittely doubles wise. 752, 725 with a 300 game in there for our singles sets. It was cake compared to the other pair. And if you saw the teams we followed, it made total sense that one pair was bad and one was nearly perfect.
This year, we got a pretty good pair for both doubles and singles. We had classified players who despite ball reaction, never moved their feet or changed balls. two players chucking plastic up the middle, and 6 playing right up 2nd arrow. It was hook right, hold in the middle. Plenty of striking power / entry angle from the deep inside line. put sets of 740/715 together in doubles/singles.
So, it should be interesting next year when we don't have the fortune or misfortune of catching a bad singles/doubles pair.