D-McL,
I agree!! WOW! It was not what I had expected from a numbers standpoint.
PROFILE: 18 mph, 540 rev rate, PAP is 5 1/2 over 3/4 up, very little axis tilt, 30 degree axis rotation
LANE CONDITION: Not fun if you are a cranker type such as myself. 32 feet of oil, ProAnvilane surfaces, fresh backends, Oil used - Control
LAYOUT: Pin above the bridge, cg under the bridge about an inch below the fingers, top weight of 3.1 ounces, pin was out 2.25 from cg, 2.6 RG, .018 Diff, surface out of the box with Track Clean and Sheen over the top of it.
GRANTED, on a 32 foot pattern, I can just about make anything hook. With the numbers being what they are, I was figuring on something with good length and smooth, but weaker backend reaction. I was wanting a ball that would be good for me on a fresh, but drier condition. I still had a difficult time keeping this ball right of the headpin. It was stronger than I had hoped. Maybe with some tweaking of the coverstock, I can achieve what I am looking for. I have yet to try it on a "normal" 38-40 foot pattern. Once I get onto a longer pattern, I will post my results from that. However, on a shorter pattern, a cranker type will not have much success unless you throw it 21-22 mph. This ball did make it through the heads pretty well. But, when it hit the midlane, it did not hesitate to rev up and make a strong, but continuous backend reaction. It was not flippy by any means. But, it was definitely stronger than what I expected. As someone who has rolled a Granite Gargoyle, the overall reaction at the breakpoint, or breakpoint shape, was extremely similar. The difference was that the Centaur's breakpoint is a few feet farther down the lane.
--------------------
If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!