Since this seems to be a different ball (new or different coverstocks plus different cores, because the RG differential is so much larger (.078 vs ,062), how, by what logic, are they grandfathered in?
I thought I understood the AMB solid& particle being grandfathered in, which was a 2nd AMB Centaur, with the same name and a solid cover, I believe, vs the original's pearl. The Immortal seems just different, with even larger differentials.
Just checked the USBC approved ball list: the Immortal pearl & solid were approved in January 2005, at the same time as the AMB balls. Hmmmmm? doesn't the USBC need a physical ball present to approve? So, if Visionary had one there in Jan. 2005, ......
Jason, what's the story?
I'm sure I'm missing something; I am curious.
thanx.
--------------------
"...for advice is a dangerous gift, even from the wise to the wise...."
J. R. R. Tolkien