win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Cover Comparison  (Read 4023 times)

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Cover Comparison
« on: February 09, 2011, 10:45:11 AM »
I am thinking about getting a ball that will give me a little more help than the Crossover and Ogre Solid on carrydown and longer patterns.  VBP has some AMB stuff NIB still available.  For those that had the Immortal and/or AMB Solid, can you give a good comparison between these balls?  Is the cover on the AMBs weaker, stronger, or similar in handling oil as compared to the Crossover and Ogre Solid?  For the record, me and the Spartan are not getting along.  For the first time this year, the Crossover was having a hard time reading the backend the other night. 



Peace doesnt always have to be silent.
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

 

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2011, 10:11:49 PM »
"For the record, me and the Spartan are not getting  along.  For the first time this year, the Crossover was having a hard  time reading the backend the other night."
 
Both my Spartan and Crossover are gone.  I run into a lot of transition and carry down and neither can handle that type of lane condition for me and my technique.  To combat that I tried a Gladiator Pearl but it also was iffy so I went to a Motiv QZ-1 Red  2000 abralon and slight polish then a slight scuff with a 4000 abralon pad with a tighter VAL angle so it would transition harder off the backend. I also believe the coverstock on the QZ-1 is stronger than any of the pearl covers that Visionary has. That ball is the ticket.  I haven't had any issues since the change.   From the inside, I feed it into the dry track gets enough length and transitions hard enough to carry well.   I was battling this all year now no issues what so ever.  Wish I would have found it earlier made it a struggle for most of the year until a few weeks back.  


Scott

Scott

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2011, 08:13:54 AM »
2hand , how do you have you Spartan laid out ? Mine seems to do pretty good with carry down. I have a NIB AMB centaur solid i thought about drilling for heavy oil, or extreme carry down.

 

Also what surface do you have on the Ogre Solid ? I have tried different surfaces on mine, if you need somthing to combat the carry down use the Ogre Soild, with 400 or 600 wet sand. It will recover for you.


TO BE THE MAN, YOU HAVE TO BEAT THE MAN

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2011, 08:46:03 AM »
Maybe it's just me but if you are say for example bowling in a 5 man league where oil is depleted in heads and you are seeing the ball lose energy (especially you guys higher rev rates).  Don't you need some type of pearl cover to get some decent length and a bit of surface plus a tighter VAL angle so the ball reads harder on the backend?  You move in catching some head oil and feed ball to dry....correct?  I don't know cuz I am just an average rev player 300-325.  Maybe you guys play it different than I but over flaring Centaur balls or Immortals would burn up more quickly?  Ogre's are not enough at least for me....I leave flat 10's with balls in either realm.  This is why I went to the QZ-1 Red 2.56 and .043 w/ MOTIVator-Z cover which I think is a stronger cover than what we see on most Visionary pearls.  I had a Glad. Pearl same layout same surface and the QZ-1 Red hit way harder than the Glad Pearl on this type of condition.  On fresh Glad. Pearl was fine. 

Scott

Scott

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2011, 09:09:58 AM »
you are correct Scott, if the heads are burnt we do need a pearl cover Unless you can loft the caps or find enough head oil deep we can still use the solid covers. I have a IM Pearl or NB pearl i can use for this condition however depending on how much carrydown you see it may not recover.

I like to use the Ogre Solid sanded @ 600 for extreme carry down, its low flare and my ball speed i can keep it on track.

 


TO BE THE MAN, YOU HAVE TO BEAT THE MAN

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2011, 10:07:41 AM »
Thanks guys.  The balls are definitely not dying.  The league is a first shift, fresh shot league.  They have ALOT of volume in the middle of the lane and go down 40 feet with the machine (not sure how much of it is buff).  For the first two games, I tried everything.  If I played 12 at arrows out to 5, it hooked too much.  If I moved in and played 17 out to 5, it wiggled too much.  So I tried direct up 10-12 and left some combination of the 2-8-10 or 2-4-8-10 3 or 4 times.  My Ogre Solid is at 1000 abralon right now.  The issue, is that for me, that surface works the best when they are fresh.  500 abralon was too dull for my rev rate I believe.  Once the track FINALLY started to wear down, I finished strong the second game and shot 258 the last game to shoot 670.  Granted 670 is a decent set but it was a tale of two halves.  First half the night, I start 185 (3 splits, 1 conversion) and then on pace for 180 again through the first five frames of the second game, to throwing 5 of the last 6 and shooting 229 and then only missing twice the last game for 250.  I had a 200 average bowler using a OOB Marvel and lit me up for 698 not including the 18 sticks I am spotting him. 

 

I am not usually one to hit the spinner and alter surfaces every night.  When I find a surface and reaction I really like out of a particular ball, I leave it there.  The layout on my Spartan is a 5 inch to PAP, 45 degrees.  Once again, on the fresh, it rolls good but then slightest hint of carry down and it wont move.  From a shot to shot basis, I get a more consistent roll from both the Crossover and Ogre. 

 

SO......my thought was to get an Immortal or AMB, something with a much stronger core, with the cover at 1000 where I can still play in a little when the Crossover and Ogre are not enough. 



Peace doesnt always have to be silent.
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2011, 10:26:05 AM »
I have to ask.  Being two handed but with lots of skill can you change your roll? 
 
When I need to play straighter being one handed I move right with my feet and up the back.  Jason has said in the past that up the backers do not do well with some of the new releases.  Count me in on that.  I can vary axis rotation moving in.  The ball for this match up for me was not anything that Visionary offers.  
 
BTW.....getuaload traded me the QZ-1 Red for a Visionary ball best trade I ever made.  


Scott

Scott

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2011, 12:08:08 PM »
I have tried to go up the back on that ball and when I do, it lacks continuation.  It almost hook stops.  Anything will hook on dry.  It is when the lanes are oiled where you get a true sense of a ball's strength.  I think VBP is falling behind a little on the higher end stuff.  The Crossover is a higher end piece but that serpentine core is not very strong.  Does it flare?  Yes.  BUT, it is a 2.56 rg which by todays standards is weak for a high end piece, especially giving that the coverstock strength may not be up to other balls on the market such as a Marvel, World Beater, Pure Physics.  Other companies have cores where the RGs are higher but they are using "supercovers".  My question is.....Can VBP come up with a cover that has good oil handling capabilities where particle isnt used in the cover, and doesnt have to be taken down to 400-500 grit?  Unfortunately, USBC has taken the monster cores that VBP was using and saying you cant use them anymore.  So, now they are trying to go in a different direction to try and keep up with other companies high end equipment but they just are not quite there.  I am thinking that since they are still "legal" in the sense they were grandfathered in, I may try to get one of the mamma jammas left in the discontinued list as my oiler.  I had a Frankie May once before and it was an absolute beast.  I really liked that React-a-Tack cover.  Kind of would like to see it make a comeback.  Wonder as to its strength compared to a Gladiator Soild and Ogre Solid.



Peace doesnt always have to be silent.
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2011, 12:40:01 PM »
If, I were you Steve I'd find an FMG.  The Gryphon core and React-A-Tack cover were superior to any of the new stuff for me and match up better to a wider variety of bowlers that is comparing strength to strength. 
 
My Spartan, Pearl Glad and Solid Glad. all spun up with the PSA in the track (left side of thumb by more than 1 1/2"s left of thumb) and X holes either did not change the drilling angle at all or moved it very little.  For me this is part of the explanation of why these balls may not work for me.  I expected something other than what I got.
 
BTW....I agree with your premise on core shapes.   There is a discussion on core shape here....


Scott

Scott

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2011, 01:50:15 PM »
I think with the newer stuff, is that you have to drill them STRONG!!!  Unless you are a big spinner, You have to put the pin at 4 inches and kick everything outside the grip quite a bit to get desired results.  In other words, the MB needs to be close to the VAL and a weight hole in the P3 or P4 position in order to have continuation.  If and when I decide to get anything else "newer", I am going to keep putting the MB at 45 degrees, which for me, puts the MB very close to my VAL so I can put a weight hole in P3 or P4 to help "make" the ball rev up and motor on the back.  With my Crossover, if I dont increase my axis rotation to about 45-60 degrees, the ball wont continue.  My typical axis rotation is closer to 30 degrees which with the newer releases and assymetric cores, makes me stuff want to hook/stop.  I am considering either a FMG or AMB Solid.



Peace doesnt always have to be silent.
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2011, 11:16:57 AM »
I have a NIB amb solid, i been thinking about drilling and want too sure on the layout for it, however i do know if you drill them too strong they will burn up. So right now i am wondering what to do with it  as far as layout goes. i will call Jason and see what he thinks but if i go 4'' pin to pap i think it will just die out on me.


TO BE THE MAN, YOU HAVE TO BEAT THE MAN

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2011, 11:39:30 AM »
Anybody want this 14 lb'er let me know. 2x strong drill.  My PAP is 5" over and 0.
 
 


Scott

Scott

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2011, 11:50:45 AM »
i am pretty sure it was originally mine, what do you want for it >?


TO BE THE MAN, YOU HAVE TO BEAT THE MAN

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2011, 12:03:44 PM »
It came from 10pin_ hater.  Cheap.  $20 plus shipping.  That sound good?  IT thumb no x hole. 


Scott

Scott

getuaload

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Cover Comparison
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2011, 12:11:09 PM »
I think he is the one who got it from me, look to the right of the thumb, i marked the VMB with my bevel knife just a small DOT / punch mark.

 

Send me you PP addy, i will take it


TO BE THE MAN, YOU HAVE TO BEAT THE MAN
 
Edited by getuaload on 2/11/2011 at 1:11 PM