win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: ogre particle for light oil?  (Read 2061 times)

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
ogre particle for light oil?
« on: October 14, 2009, 02:15:26 PM »
I'm thinking maybe the ogre particle might be a good choice for a light oil ball.depends on the particle load in the ball and type of particle.and ofcourse how easy this ball takes cover changes and polish.
Thoughts?
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2009, 10:39:41 PM »
Nope! Not for light oil.
Major Nope!

Use it for true heavy oil or for wet/drys. You can take it to P2000 grit or P4000 grit for medium+ to medium-heavy oil.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2009, 10:44:27 PM »
maybe something with glass particle then? you might know whit I'm considering charlest.
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

sluggo35

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2009, 12:38:48 AM »
i couldn't get away with using it on anything med or above oil, same with granite
Logged

gsback

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1619
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2009, 06:31:39 AM »
Not sure about that guys.

We were at the TCBA All Stars last year at Forum Bowl in Grand Prairie, Tx....and the 4 test lanes Jason was given did not have much for oil later in the day.

Willie had his Ogre Particle shined....nicely....and I threw some shots and was amazed at the length the ball got and the carry.  Ball did burn up at all.  I''ve thought about doing the same thing.....just never did it.

I believe Jason has given directions on how to take the ball back to original cover somewhere in the Visionary Forum.....might have to search for it.

On edit.....polish may work for the people that aren''t throwing 350+ revs!!  I am not near there.....so maybe that''s why I can get away with the polish on the ball.
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  

www.visionarybowling.com - Accept no substitute for the very best there is!!

Edited on 10/15/2009 6:32 AM
Logged
www.visionarybowling.com - Accept no substitute for the very best there is!!

Best line I've heard about politics....
REMEMBER....POLITICIANS AND DIAPERS SHOULD BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON!!

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2009, 07:15:52 AM »
I think the point is here like has been said many many manufacturers ie. new guy....use the ball that we manufacturer for the types of lane condition that we manufacturer it for.  http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=244375&ForumID=112&CategoryID=2

newguy said "We design balls for specific conditions, minor tweaks to fine tune a ball is suggested, totally altering the surface or extreme drillings to make a camel look like a horse is usually a recipe for disaster. My suggestion is to go back to basics and use it for what it is meant."

IMO if sixpack is looking to a lighter load particle then look at the New Breed Pearl Particle that is coming out and tweak it rather than the Ogre Particle a heavier load ball that is manufactured for heavier lane conditions to even out wet/dry walls.
--------------------
Scott

Logged
Scott

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2009, 07:26:29 AM »
But what about sanding an OP's surface to a high grit, say 4.000 Abralon, and then hit it with a wax containing compound - actually killing the surface (a bit) and just rely on the particles for traction? I understand that the Ogre, with its higher RG and lower differential, should offer a good base for lighter conditions, but I am not certain if it would actually work, mechanically...?
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Logged
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

Shaggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 718
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2009, 07:31:09 AM »
The Ogre Particle is too strong for light oil conditions unless you make a significant coverstock adjustment and add an extender like Valentino UFO.   I would recommend you select a different ball that is better suited for the light oil condition.
--------------------
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!
Logged
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2009, 08:35:29 AM »
Yup. Sad that the particle Power Grooves are no more... With polish, these things were/are great control pieces on lighter and spotty lanes.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
Logged
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

gsback

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1619
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2009, 10:58:57 AM »
quote:
use the ball that we manufacturer for the types of lane condition that we manufacturer it for


For the record, I am a firm believer in this actually.

However, bowler A, depending on lane conditions, hand, speed, etc may actually like the current reaction of the Ogre Particle and putting a shine on it might actually make it perform better than, say, the NB Particle Pearl.

Again.....I would leave the ball where it is and get something else for the desired reaction.
--------------------
BR.com.....going down the toilet one nugget at a time!!  

g thing is back....with a vengeance!!  

www.visionarybowling.com - Accept no substitute for the very best there is!!
Logged
www.visionarybowling.com - Accept no substitute for the very best there is!!

Best line I've heard about politics....
REMEMBER....POLITICIANS AND DIAPERS SHOULD BE CHANGED OFTEN AND FOR THE SAME REASON!!

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2009, 11:48:58 AM »
WHY???? There are so many better options than trying to tame this beast into a lamb.

quote:
I'm thinking maybe the ogre particle might be a good choice for a light oil ball.depends on the particle load in the ball and type of particle.and ofcourse how easy this ball takes cover changes and polish.
Thoughts?
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Logged

six pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2799
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2009, 12:30:13 PM »
I've tried it on a track phenom with great results,better then any light oil reactive and most urethanes.I'm not sure on the type of particle in the phenom though.how would you like to have a light oil ball that is never jumpy and carries? I think the high load in the phenom makes the ball less reactive and the lay out and cover adjustments get it down the lane.I've not had much luck with particle pearls as they are more reactive due to the low particle load.
the one thing I hate most are these light oil reactives that always hook to much or have poor performance.
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Logged
The harder I try the harder they fall

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2009, 12:48:22 PM »
1- Phenom is no Ogre Particle
2- Urethane....

quote:
I've tried it on a track phenom with great results,better then any light oil reactive and most urethanes.I'm not sure on the type of particle in the phenom though.how would you like to have a light oil ball that is never jumpy and carries? I think the high load in the phenom makes the ball less reactive and the lay out and cover adjustments get it down the lane.I've not had much luck with particle pearls as they are more reactive due to the low particle load.
the one thing I hate most are these light oil reactives that always hook to much or have poor performance.
--------------------
The harder I try the harder they fall
Logged

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2009, 12:51:46 PM »
six pack,

I understand what you are trying to do.  Don't disagree with you either.  Light oil I am not sure about but seems you are trying to control the backend but still drive thru on carried down lanes with depleted heads?  I have done this with higher Rg balls heavier particle load w/ polish ie. Bruns Navy Fuze & Leg Yeah Baby) but for true light oil I couldn't use these.

You mentioned glass particles.  TEC?
--------------------
Scott

Logged
Scott

lenstanles703

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: ogre particle for light oil?
« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2009, 02:57:45 PM »
Try an Ogre Urethane.
--------------------
"We are all one"
Visionary test staff member
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »