Hi fbila,
I doubt we will be putting the Eradicator on the AMB's. The Immortals would no longer be passed by the USBC, and I think the Centaur AMB's have a pretty complete line. We have never been a company to come out with a new ball and swap the cover, just to release a new ball. It might be a great ball, but my guess is that it would overlap the Centaur AMB Solid, and we really try to avoid overlapping as much as possible.
absolutebowling - Hey bud...how are things in Australia. You guys kill me with how much you love your pies. Some day you will have to show me what is so special about these Aussie pies.
Charlest-
Naming coverstocks is something that I never really anticipated doing, because we don't usually use the exact same coverstock on more than a couple balls. When we design the equipment, we have a specific core design and reaction in mind, and than we test out different coverstocks and modify them to match up with what we want. Even slight modifications to the coverstocks chemical structure can make a very significant difference to the way the ball reacts on the lane, and naming every modified cover is not something that I thought we would be doing. We have started naming the coverstocks because the industry has dictated that we do so, but I think knowing the characteristics of the ball as a whole is much more important than the characteristics of a single part.
Even when you know how a certain coverstock works, it really doesn't mean that you are going to have the same characteristics from ball to ball. The core designs and weight distributions can play just as important of a role as the covers.
Glad to hear that you are having success with your equipment. The Green/Blue Centaur is a niche ball, but it definitely filled a hole that we had in the line.
You are right, Scott is being a great ambassador for our company, and I very much appreciate all of his support, along with everyone else that here that tries to help promote our equipment.
Loki,
Believe me when I say that you are not the only one looking forward to a pearl particle. I receive requests for a pearl particle from a number of bowlers every week.
I have tested several pearl particle coverstocks, and to be completely honest, we haven't really found what a pearl particle does that can't be done by slightly modifying the surface on a solid reactive.
Particle balls by nature, will need much more maintenance and cleaning than most reactives, and particles will over time break down and need more resurfacing than other types of balls. If you can get a similar reaction, without using particles, isn't that the better route to go? Anyone out there who has a pearl particle, and tried to fool around with the surfaces on our solid reactives and not been able to get them to match up?
That being said, I'm sure we will come out with one sooner or later, because the demand for one is so high.
Hey Tim,
How's it going up in Canada? Haven't heard from you in a while. I can't say that the solid Ogre and the Charcoal are real close, but they do cover similar lane conditions, and it did get me to retire my Charcoal (atleast for now). As you know, the Charcoal was all I used for a number of years, and is one of my all time favorite balls, so it says alot that I replaced it's spot in my bag with the Ogre.
Hi Josh,
I know Lindenwood very well. They have a very good bowling program there. Because of the chemicals that we use in our production process, insurance does not allow us to give tours, but you are more than welcome to stop by and say hi. As a TSM, you can pick your balls up at the plant if you would like. Just make sure that you give us a call so that we can make sure we have what you want in inventory.
TrimMan,
Thanks for your kind words. I'm glad to hear that you are happy with us and the product. Let me know if there is anything that I can help you out with.
Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products
Edited on 4/15/2007 11:10 AM
Edited on 4/15/2007 11:13 AM