win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Q & A  (Read 16679 times)

VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Q & A
« on: April 13, 2007, 04:50:01 AM »
Hello All,

     For those of you who don't know me, my name is Jason Wonders, VP of Marketing for Visionary Bowling Products.  Lately I have been receiving a lot of requests to come on here and provide information and insight into our equipment line.  

     Typically, I like to stand back and view these posts from the outside so that I get unbiased opinions.  However, since there has been enough demand, I figured I would start a post that could strictly be a question and answer section on our line of equipment.

     Fire away,
    Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products

 

VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Q & A
« Reply #46 on: April 26, 2007, 03:10:18 PM »
Hi Blindstag,

We will have a particle version of the Ogre for heavy oil patterns.  We have been testing out a couple different versions, and to this point no decision has been made on which to go with, so I really can't give you much information on it.

Hey Lane1Bowler,

Thank you for the kind words.  Hopefully over time we can gain your business and loyalty, and get that name changed to VisionaryBowler

Hi Loanzone,

I think that your best bet for heavy oil patterns would be the Frankie May Gryphon.  With a ball speed of 13-14 mph, I'm afraid that anything much stronger would never get used because he would never see enough oil.

I have not seen very many throw the Hammer Toxic, and I'm not sure how the two of them would compare to each other.  My guess from what I have heard about the toxic, is that the Frankie would handle significantly more oil, but won't be quite as angular on the backend.  Also, the Frankie should handle carrydown better, so when the lanes start to transition, and people push the oil down to the breakpoint, the FM Gryphon should keep him in play longer.

If anyone out there has thrown both of them, how would you compare the two?

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Q & A
« Reply #47 on: April 26, 2007, 03:44:26 PM »
quote:
If anyone out there has thrown both of them, how would you compare the two?


The closet ball that would compare favorably with the Toxic is the Crimson Executioner.  Crimson in retirement.  Same type of cover the Toxic a hybrid type pearl, same kind of differential and Rg.  Same kind of ball motion.

I like Jason's suggestion of an FMG for a higher up oil ball....good roll and not a lot of over reaction.  

--------------------
Scott

Scott

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Q & A
« Reply #48 on: April 26, 2007, 04:00:44 PM »
I disagree with the assessment of the Toxic.  The Doom is closer to the Crimson as far as ball reaction and shape is concerned.  The Crimson tends to be pretty angular off the spot (as all 3 of mine do).  The Toxic is a perfect blend of the length and control.  It is cleaner through the front than the Pain.  But, is is not as angular on the backend as the Doom.  The FM Gryphon is going to handle more oil and still give him some backend that the Toxic doesnt have.  I am sure you can make the Toxic angular.  But, after many games with my FM and seeing the Toxic in action up close, the FM is going to be WAY more ball than the Toxic.  

Hope this helps Jason and the rest of the Visionary family.  Comparing the FM to another ball, is more like a Pain on steroids...not the Toxic.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Q & A
« Reply #49 on: April 26, 2007, 04:19:41 PM »
quote:
I am sure you can make the Toxic angular. But, after many games with my FM and seeing the Toxic in action up close, the FM is going to be WAY more ball than the Toxic.


I have a Toxic drilled like my Crimson and it's the same ball motion and hook....as always your mileage may vary.  I do agree Doom is also angular.  Guess it's layout and technique w/ lane condition.

FMG vs. Crimson or Toxic no comparison.



--------------------
Scott

Scott

imjouster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 643
Re: Q & A
« Reply #50 on: May 02, 2007, 02:20:38 AM »
Gotta give a bump to this awesome topic.  Thanks again Jason  The info on the Pink Hammer was really helpful.

Jeremy
--------------------
"Strive to be perfect,  that is afterall the only way to become perfect."

"If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans."


Taken from Desiderata


Proud user of Columbia 300 and Visionary Bowling Products

Eddie M

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 751
Re: Q & A
« Reply #51 on: May 03, 2007, 04:32:30 PM »
I have a quick question.  

I noticed on your website, that you list hook ratings for most of your equipment.  Is there any chance you could also list the hook rating for the 2 Ogres also?  It is really nice to be able to see some sort of rating, so you can make a more well informed choice on which ball to pick.  Even better, would be a chart showing the overall expected reaction on a lane... kinda like what most other ball companies do.
--------------------
Visionary Test Staff 07-08
Right Handed
Motiv Venom Shock, Motiv Freestyle, Storm Mix
avg: 221 - hg: 300 x7

Left Handed
Storm Street Fight, Storm Mix
avg: 180

VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Q & A
« Reply #52 on: May 04, 2007, 01:42:42 PM »
Hi Eddie,

We are working on developing a new hook rating system.  The problems that we are facing with the old rating system is that each bowling style rates the balls differently, and when you average them out, some of the balls come out almost identical.

For example, when a cranker throws something like the Green Gargoyle (pearlized reactive) on a medium house condition with fresh backends, it can absolutely fly across the lane.  For myself (i turn the ball a fair amount), I can go gutter to gutter, and I would call the overall hook rating on this condition a 90/100, and the backend 95/100.  When a stroker throws the ball, they wouldn't get nearly the same amount of pop on the backend, so the overall hook would be less and they may rate the overall hook rating at 75/100 and the backends at 80/100.  Average it out, and it becomes 83/100 for overall hook, and 88/100 for backend.

Now, throw a particle on the same lane condition, and while it hooks much earlier for me, it bleeds off alot more energy during the front portion of the lane where there is oil, and doesn't have much left on the backend.  I may call the overall hook on this condition 85/100 and the backend 80/100.  When the stroker throws the ball, his low rev rate will allow the ball to retain some of it's energy, so he gets bigger backends and more overall hook.  He might rate it as 88/100 for overall hook, and 92/100 for the backends.  Averaged out between the two styles, and this particle ball now has an overall hook rating of 86/100 for overall hook and 86/100 for backends.

Comparing the two, you get the following:

Pearl Reactive ball - overall 83/100    backend - 88/100

Particle ball - overall hook 86/100    backend - 86/100


Even though we both rated the balls completely different because of our styles, the averages ended up being pretty close to the same.  If a cranker purchases both of these balls, and thinks he is only going to see 2 points difference in backend, he will be disappointed when the particle ball doesn't have even close to the same backends.

Vice Versa, if a stroker buys them both, he would be disappointed that the skid/snap ball doesn't come close to the same amount of overall hook.

As I said earlier, we are working on a new method of comparing the balls, and we should have it ready by the time we release the catalog in June.

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products

Edited on 5/4/2007 1:45 PM

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Q & A
« Reply #53 on: May 04, 2007, 01:53:19 PM »
Good explnation Jason.  I liken your explanation to how BTM does their ball reviews using stroker, tweener and crankers numbers.  Same kind of comparision with differeing lane conditions....for the most part I like BTM's reviews and can get a decent idea along with users of BR.com and others that favorably compare with my game.
--------------------
Scott

Scott

RWOOD300

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: Q & A
« Reply #54 on: May 04, 2007, 02:41:05 PM »
hi Jason, i am really interested in joining the test staff platinum package but one of the benefits is have 30-50% of all equipment but when checking the website for prices on the new stuff i couldn't find them please help me with this question and i want to thank you in advance for your time
--------------------
Remember anything can happen
BOWL TO WIN !!!!!
Remember anything can happen
BOWL TO WIN !!!!!

VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Q & A
« Reply #55 on: May 04, 2007, 02:44:17 PM »
Hi RWOOD,

If you could, please email me at vbpadvertising@aol.com, and I will get you any information that you need.

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products

MC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1300
Re: Q & A
« Reply #56 on: May 04, 2007, 10:52:37 PM »
Jason,

Are you still doing the monthly quiz contests? There are not any winners posted since January.

Thanks
--------------------
Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence.
                    -Vince Lombardi


VISIONARY TEST STAFF 07/08

ozsweet

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 486
Re: Q & A
« Reply #57 on: May 05, 2007, 07:06:14 AM »
Jason:
1) thanks for being so helpful.

2) Where are my 15 lb NIB Midnight Scorcher & Infrared Amulet?

Keep up the good work!
--------------------
Just bowl!

Jmiller88

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 232
Re: Q & A
« Reply #58 on: May 05, 2007, 02:58:31 PM »
My name is Jimmy, and I know a few of the family members, (Jeff and his daugher) i was told about a blue and silver ogre. whats the word on that one?
James Miller
DV8 Regional Staff Member

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Q & A
« Reply #59 on: May 05, 2007, 10:55:19 PM »
JMiller,

The Bluver Ogre is going to be very close in roll/reaction to the Green Gargoyle.  It is going to be the Greenie's replacement.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Q & A
« Reply #60 on: May 07, 2007, 11:28:33 AM »
Hi MC,

We have still been giving away a ball each month for the drawing, the website just hasn't posted the winners for the past few months.  The winners are still being notified, and have collected the balls, it just hasn't been posted.

Hey Oz,

Sorry bud, the stars just haven't aligned right to find those balls for you yet.  I will definitely let you know if any of these somehow happen to show up.

Hi Jimmy,

The Silver/Blue Ogre is going to be a replacement for the Green Gargoyle.  It is a skid/snap type ball that will be best suited for med-drier lane conditions, or house shots with fresh backends.  It isn't meant for much carrydown, but this ball can really open up the lanes when the shot is right.

We haven't set a release date yet, and we were hoping to get it by the end of May, but it looks like it is going to be sometime in June now.  When we have an official release date, I will come on here and post it.

Jason Wonders
Visionary Bowling Products