win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Question for Jason:  (Read 1156 times)

Whiskey 1966

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Question for Jason:
« on: December 28, 2008, 06:11:48 AM »
I noticed on bowlingballreviews.com the core in the Faball Spike is the same core in your New Breed Series, except the New Breed core has the wedge on it.

What are the biggest advances in bowling ball technology today? It must be cover stock chemistry because I see most of the bowling ball companies re-use older core shapes in new product.

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Question for Jason:
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2008, 03:20:31 PM »
Similar, not the same.

After all, how many core shapes can you have that make a true difference?
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

icewall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 906
Re: Question for Jason:
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2008, 03:30:16 PM »
you also cant blame them as they are in the faball plant.

also keep in mind this core is not the same density (or the wrap)  as according to bowling ball reviews it has a differential of .070 which is much higher then the new breeds.

keep in mind designing a "good" core isnt that hard but coverstock tech is always changing.

--------------------
Visionary Test Staff 08/09

all visionary this year

blurple
ogre ss
glad.
glad. pearl

Edited on 12/28/2008 4:34 PM

Edited on 12/28/2008 4:36 PM

jbuzz31

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Question for Jason:
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2008, 07:32:08 PM »
why not?

900 global is re using tweaked older C300, Dynothane and Track cores,
and they work.

so if it works. who gives a ****



--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason

Nor Cal Bowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1535
Re: Question for Jason:
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2008, 02:48:16 PM »
Just because it looks similar doesnt mean its the same density. Look at the DC core. That thing was tweaked many times too for different balls by modifying the caps, density, etc.
--------------------
Visionary Test Staffer 08/09
www.visionarybowling.com

Looking for the following...
16# Visionary Frankie May Gryphon
16# Banger Hole Finder Pearl
16# InSite Revelation


VBPadvertising

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Question for Jason:
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2008, 10:47:38 AM »
Hi Whiskey,

Advancements are being made in every aspect of a bowling ball.  As icewall and Nor Cal said, the core shapes may be close, but slight modifications to shape and density can make very significant differences in a balls reaction.  

We tried to prove this with the AMB Core design.  If you look at the Immortals, Centaurs and Ogres, we used a very similar shape in all of them.  However, we modified the weight distribution, changed cap and body densities and added or removed caps to completely change the way they all reacted.

In general, the core in the New Breed does look quite similar to the Spike, but it is definitely not the same.  If I remember correctly, the body is larger and more dense than the Spike and we added a mass on the side similar to the Gladiators.

That being said... advancements in coverstocks are more noticeable, and might have the greatest opportunity for modification from here on out.  Obviously we can still change cores to assist in a balls reaction, but with the current USBC guidelines, I don't know of anything we can do to create a totally unique reaction simply because of a core.  You never know though, many people thought there was no way we could come up with something that was better than polyester....and then thought that there was no way we could make a coverstock better than a urethane.  We will continue to look for new materials and modifications that will be the next big breakthrough.

Jason

Edited on 12/31/2008 12:28 PM