win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Scorcher vs Burgandy gryphon  (Read 970 times)

PJM300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 607
Scorcher vs Burgandy gryphon
« on: August 22, 2003, 11:58:04 PM »
Plain and simple whats better on heavy long patters with carrydown?? can the burgandy hold up to the scorcher on this shot?

Logged

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Scorcher vs Burgandy gryphon
« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2003, 06:02:41 PM »
Scorcher has the significantly stronger core BUT it is urethane based, with the particle embedded in urethane NOT resin, by VIsionary's own admission. It is one of the earliest grabbing and smallest hooking of the current oil-sucking particles.

The Gryphon is probably the more versatile and it should also handle heavy oil.

Both balls require a good amount of oil in the heads and the midlane to perform effectively.

Many people cannot mentally or emotionally handle how little the Scorcher hooks.  Funny that!

--------------------
"Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Scorcher vs Burgandy gryphon
« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2003, 07:08:24 PM »
quote:
Many people cannot mentally or emotionally handle how little the Scorcher hooks. Funny that!  


I agree charlest.  For the bowler that likes a straighter shot covering less boards on a flood you can't beat The Midnight Scorcher.  I love mine on that lane condition.  Carry is excellent!

Scott
Logged
Scott
Pages: [1]
« previous next »