Modern bowling/scoring is all about matchups. His style, revs, tilt, axis rotation, and ball might be the perfect combination for that house. Once again, what do his "accomplishments" have to do with scoring on tougher shots? Many top pros don't really tear up league shots because their game isn't geared towards it. There are plenty of house mouses (*cough* Rev-O *cough*) that don't do much on harder shots. While we kid them about their lack of ability outside of their comfort zone, we don't tell them they have to give back their 300/800 rings. Now, maybe he shot a 900 sometime, but I certainly don't think he shot multiple 900's, but USBC is stuck not being able to PROVE that he didn't.
I don't often defend LL, but I agree with one thing he says. Lots of people keep saying they would destroy his house shot. Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't, but until you do, put a lid on it. Maybe I could tear up Rev-O's house, maybe not. Maybe Rev-O matches up with it 10 times better than I would.
--------------------
Telling it like it is.